Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Equitable Compensation And The Brickenden “Rule” After Winsta Holding Pte Ltd And Another V Sim Poh Ping And Others, Nicholas Liu
Equitable Compensation And The Brickenden “Rule” After Winsta Holding Pte Ltd And Another V Sim Poh Ping And Others, Nicholas Liu
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The Brickenden rule, which was thought to provide an exception to the requirement of but-for causation of loss in equitable compensation for breach of fiduciary duty, has recently been rejected by the Singapore High Court in Winsta Holding Pte Ltd and another v Sim Poh Ping and others (Winsta Holding). This case comment suggests that although the substantive position arrived at in Winsta Holding is a sound one, it should not entail a rejection of the Brickenden rule. Properly understood, the Brickenden “rule” is consistent with the requirement that the principal prove but-for causation.
Equity And Trusts [2014], Hang Wu Tang
Equity And Trusts [2014], Hang Wu Tang
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
No abstract provided.
Equity And Trusts [2014], Hang Wu Tang
Equity And Trusts [2014], Hang Wu Tang
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
No abstract provided.