Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Intent And Consent In The Law Of Battery: Confusion And Controversy, Nancy J. Moore
Intent And Consent In The Law Of Battery: Confusion And Controversy, Nancy J. Moore
Nancy J Moore
Abstract
“Intent and Consent in the Tort of Battery:
Confusion and Controversy”
Much of contemporary torts scholarship has been devoted to determining who should bear the costs of unintended injury, that is, whether and when defendants should be strictly liable for the harm caused by their activities, as opposed to limiting plaintiffs to recovery when they can prove that the defendant’s conduct was negligent. Comparatively little scholarship has explored the appropriate distinction between the intentional torts and the non-intentional torts, such as negligence or strict liability. Recently, torts scholars have begun to explore some interesting and unresolved questions surrounding the …
Intent And Consent In The Law Of Battery: Confusion And Controversy, Nancy J. Moore
Intent And Consent In The Law Of Battery: Confusion And Controversy, Nancy J. Moore
Nancy J Moore
Abstract
“Intent and Consent in the Tort of Battery:
Confusion and Controversy”
Much of contemporary torts scholarship has been devoted to determining who should bear the costs of unintended injury, that is, whether and when defendants should be strictly liable for the harm caused by their activities, as opposed to limiting plaintiffs to recovery when they can prove that the defendant’s conduct was negligent. Comparatively little scholarship has explored the appropriate distinction between the intentional torts and the non-intentional torts, such as negligence or strict liability. Recently, torts scholars have begun to explore some interesting and unresolved questions surrounding the …
Intent And Consent In The Law Of Battery: Confusion And Controversy, Nancy J. Moore
Intent And Consent In The Law Of Battery: Confusion And Controversy, Nancy J. Moore
Nancy J Moore
Much of contemporary torts scholarship has been devoted to determining who should bear the costs of unintended injury, that is, whether and when defendants should be strictly liable for the harm caused by their activities, as opposed to limiting plaintiffs to recovery when they can prove that the defendant’s conduct was negligent. Comparatively little scholarship has explored the appropriate distinction between the intentional torts and the non-intentional torts, such as negligence or strict liability. Recently, torts scholars have begun to explore some interesting and unresolved questions surrounding the intentional torts, particularly battery, stemming in part from the completion of various …