Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Law - Race Segregation Ordinance - Effect Of Military Order Of Governor Issued For Same Purpose
Michigan Law Review
A "segregation ordinance" of Oklahoma City, prospective in nature, made it unlawful for any negro to occupy as a residence any house or building located in a block wherein a majority of the buildings used were occupied by white persons. The initial step in the segregation of races in the city occurred when the Governor issued a military order for the separation of the races, because it appeared that riot and bloodshed were imminent; such order to remain in effect until an ordinance was passed in lieu of the order. Held, the ordinance was an invalid exercise of the …
Public Utilities-Injunction Restraining Enforcement Of Rate Order Of State Commission-Jurisdiction Of Federal Court Under Johnson Act
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs sued in a federal district court for an injunction restraining enforcement of an order of the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma reducing gas rates. The plaintiffs alleged that the new rates were confiscatory and in violation of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. It appeared that there was much uncertainty in the decisions of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma as to whether the appeal to that court from the orders of the Corporation Commission were legislative or judicial. Held, that in view of the uncertainty of an opportunity for judicial review of the orders of the Commission, …
Banks And Banking-Constitutional Validity Of Statutes Allowing Reorganization Of Insolvent Bank
Banks And Banking-Constitutional Validity Of Statutes Allowing Reorganization Of Insolvent Bank
Michigan Law Review
A statute of Mississippi permitted the reopening of a closed bank, for the purpose of paying off creditors, upon terms proposed by three-fourths of the bank's creditors. The statute required that the proposition of the creditors be approved by the state superintendent of banks and confirmed by the court of chancery. Dissenting creditors opposed such a plan on the ground that the statute was unconstitutional because it impaired the obligation of contracts, and was contrary to the due process clause of the Federal Constitution. The court held that the statute was valid, that all it did was to change the …
Taxation-Right Of Federal Taxpayer To Question Validity Of A Federal Tax-Effect Of Section 3224 Of The United States Revised Statutes
Michigan Law Review
Quite apart from the merits of the controversy, the recent decision of the Supreme Court in the Hoosac Mills case presented the interesting problem of the taxpayer's standing in court to question the validity of a federal tax. The problem is really twofold. First, may the taxpayer enjoin the collection of the tax? Second, assuming that he may not, what steps must he take before he can get a refund of the amount that he has paid?