Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Contracts (12)
- Property Law and Real Estate (7)
- Banking and Finance Law (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
-
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Torts (1)
Articles 1 - 23 of 23
Full-Text Articles in Law
Addressing Default Trends In Patent-Based Section 337 Proceedings In The United States International Trade Commission, John C. Evans
Addressing Default Trends In Patent-Based Section 337 Proceedings In The United States International Trade Commission, John C. Evans
Michigan Law Review
Section 337 of the Tarif Act of 1930 empowers the United States International Trade Commission to investigate imports to ensure imports do not infringe on U.S. trademarks. The Commission permits patent, copyright, and trademark owners to notify the Commission of possibly infringing imports and to obtain exclusion orders that prevent importation of products that infringe their intellectual property. The total number of investigations increased from 1996 to 2005, yet the proportion of respondent defaults rose as well. The increase in defaults suggests there is some systemic difficulty in ensuring full participation. This Note argues that the res judicata effects of …
On The Threshold Of Wainwright V Sykes: Federal Habeas Court Scrutiny Of State Procedural Rules And Rulings, Michigan Law Review
On The Threshold Of Wainwright V Sykes: Federal Habeas Court Scrutiny Of State Procedural Rules And Rulings, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines specific problems which stand on the threshold of Wainwright v. Sykes. Resolution of these problems is necessary to determine whether a state ruling is based upon an adequate state procedural ground, requiring application of the cause-and-prejudice test before habeas review will be permitted. Part I analyzes the rationale for the rule of Wainwright v. Sykes as well as its historical underpinnings. Part II examines the treatment of state court decisions that are based both on a defaulted claim and, in the alternative, on the merits of that claim. This Part concludes that decisions containing such alternative …
Notice Requirements Of Guaranty Contracts, Richard F. Dole Jr.
Notice Requirements Of Guaranty Contracts, Richard F. Dole Jr.
Michigan Law Review
The following is an attempt to verify Corbin's educated guess through the application of factual analysis. If significant facts can be isolated which produce the same result regardless of the theory applied by the court, no real conflict can be said to exist. An initial exploration of the problems involved is a prerequisite to delineating the area in which factual analysis must be used.
The Installment Land Contract As A Junior Security, E. George Rudolph
The Installment Land Contract As A Junior Security, E. George Rudolph
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this paper to explore the problems of one group whose members are increasingly, and more or less as a matter of necessity, finding themselves in the role of mortgagees, or vendors under installment purchase contracts, although they do not fit the assumed pattern. This group consists of persons who own homes subject to existing mortgages and for one reason or another decide to sell. The existing mortgages may be insured by the Federal Housing Administration or by the Veterans Administration or they may be uninsured mortgages held by building and loan associations or other financial …
Mortgages-Mortgagee's Rights Against Tenant Who Occupies Premises Under Subsequent Lease By Mortgagor, Charles E. Becraft S. Ed.
Mortgages-Mortgagee's Rights Against Tenant Who Occupies Premises Under Subsequent Lease By Mortgagor, Charles E. Becraft S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this comment to discuss possible rights of the mortgagee or the purchaser at foreclosure sale, who stands in the place of the mortgagee, in dealing with a tenant of the mortgagor who holds under a lease subsequent to execution of the mortgage. Only the law of those states in which the lien theory of mortgages is in force will be considered.
Bills And Notes--Holder In Due Course-Purchasing Installment After Maturity, John E. Grosboll
Bills And Notes--Holder In Due Course-Purchasing Installment After Maturity, John E. Grosboll
Michigan Law Review
Three installment notes were pledged to the plaintiffs by the payee as security. At the time plaintiffs took the notes, the first installment of each was overdue and unpaid. In an action by plaintiffs against the makers, the latter pleaded in defense failure of consideration and fraud on the part of the payee. Held, plaintiffs were not holders in due course and consequently took the notes subject to the defense of the makers. Bliss v. California Co-op. Producers, (Cal. 1946) 172 P. (2d) 62.
Vendor And Purchaser-Vendor's Release Of Sub-Assignee Held A Discharge Of All Prior Assignees, Robert M. Warren
Vendor And Purchaser-Vendor's Release Of Sub-Assignee Held A Discharge Of All Prior Assignees, Robert M. Warren
Michigan Law Review
The bank for which plaintiff is receiver sold land on contract. There followed four successive assignments of the vendee's interest, in each of which the assignee expressly assumed the contract obligation. After the fourth assignment, default occurred as to payments and taxes, and plaintiff began negotiations to sell the property to an intermediate assignee, R. To effectuate this sale, plaintiff procured an assignment in blank from the fourth assignee, W, in consideration of a release of W from further liability on the contract. The negotiations with R having failed, plaintiff brought suit against the vendee and all the …
Sales - Recovery By Seller Against Third Party Tortfeasor, Robert A. Solomon
Sales - Recovery By Seller Against Third Party Tortfeasor, Robert A. Solomon
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sold a truck under a conditional sales contract expressly reserving title until the purchase price was paid by the buyer. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, possession was transferred to the latter. While the truck was in his possession it was destroyed through the negligence of the defendant, a third party. At the time of the destruction the buyer had not defaulted in the payments. Held, affirming the decision of the lower court, that the plaintiff had no right to maintain an action against the defendant to recover for the negligent destruction of the truck. Gas City …
Trusts - Spendthrift Trusts - Beneficial Interest Held Not Attachable To Make Good Liability As Trustee, W. Wallace Kent
Trusts - Spendthrift Trusts - Beneficial Interest Held Not Attachable To Make Good Liability As Trustee, W. Wallace Kent
Michigan Law Review
Janet Jones was an inactive trustee and one of the beneficiaries of a spendthrift trust. Because of lack of good judgment on the part of her co-trustee, and without any moral fault on her part, Janet was charged with liability for a large sum. Her surety, who paid the succeeding trustee, took an assignment of the rights of the trust estate against Janet Jones and demanded that the trustee pay to it all the income, past, present and future, which the trust instrument gave to such beneficiary. The trustee brought this action for instructions. Held, as the trust estate …
Fixtures - Uniform Conditional Sales Act - Interpretation Of The Word "Freehold", Robert E. Sipes
Fixtures - Uniform Conditional Sales Act - Interpretation Of The Word "Freehold", Robert E. Sipes
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff installed elevators in an apartment house under construction. The elevators were covered by a conditional sale contract with the general contractor. Prior to the sale of the elevators the apartment house had been mortgaged. Upon the contractor's default in payment for the elevators, plaintiff asserted his right to remove the elevators as against the owner of the apartment and the mortgagee. Held, the elevators could be removed. Otis Elevator Co. v. Arey-Hauser Co., (D. C. Pa. 1938) 22 F. Supp. 4.
Corporations - Validity Of Contract Executed During Suspension Of Charter For Failure To File Proper Annual Report - Effect Of Innocent Mistake, Ralph Winkler
Michigan Law Review
A Virginia statute, providing that foreign corporations desiring to carry on intrastate business there must pay an entrance fee graduated according to authorized capital stock, imposed on plaintiff a fee of $5,000. Only two-thirds of plaintiff's authorized stock was issued. A considerable amount of its assets were used in interstate commerce, though the sum invested in Virginia was negligible. Plaintiff contended that such an entrance fee burdened interstate commerce because measured by property used in interstate commerce, that it denied due process because measured by property without the state, and that it denied equal protection of the laws becaused measured …
Mortgages - Set-Off In Action Against Assuming Grantee On Third Party Beneficiary Theory, Anthony L. Dividio
Mortgages - Set-Off In Action Against Assuming Grantee On Third Party Beneficiary Theory, Anthony L. Dividio
Michigan Law Review
Evans and Fulmer entered into an agreement for an exchange of two pieces of property. Fulmer assumed two mortgages on the property conveyed to her. According to the agreement, Evans gave a first mortgage on the property conveyed to him to a third person and a second mortgage to Fulmer. Evans defaulted on the first mortgage assumed by him; Fulmer, who held the second mortgage, foreclosed and as a result suffered a $17,000 loss. Later, Evans regained possession of the promissory notes evidencing the second mortgage on the property conveyed to Fulmer, and assigned them to Goldfarb who sued Fulmer, …
Contracts - Specific Enforcement Of An Executory Accord, Benjamin H. Dewey
Contracts - Specific Enforcement Of An Executory Accord, Benjamin H. Dewey
Michigan Law Review
Sometime previous to the suit in question, defendant had executed a mortgage to the plaintiff, the loan secured by such mortgage to be repaid in installments. After having paid some but not all of the installments, defendant defaulted. As a result of negotiations between the parties and the Federal Land Bank of Omaha, it was agreed that the defendant should pay a lump sum in full satisfaction of the balance of the installments due under the mortgage. Performance was later tendered under this agreement, but the plaintiff refused to accept same, and subsequently brought suit in equity to foreclose the …
The Notice Due To A Guarantor, Morton C. Campbell
The Notice Due To A Guarantor, Morton C. Campbell
Michigan Law Review
A guaranty is usually an offer contemplating a unilateral contract in that it requires for acceptance an act or series of acts, or abstention from action, on the part of the offeree. The act or acts ordinarily consist in the furnishing of money, goods, services, or the like, by the offeree to the principal in reliance on the guaranty; or in the assumption of suretyship risk by the offeree on behalf of the principal. Abstention from action commonly consists in the offeree's refraining from pressing the principal by suit or otherwise for an overdue debt.
Corporations - Parent's Liability For Subsidiary's Obligations, Michigan Law Review
Corporations - Parent's Liability For Subsidiary's Obligations, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A parent corporation owned all the stock of a subsidiary which it had organized to hold real estate, its own business being mercantile. The directors and officers of both corporations were identical. The subsidiary sublet premises for ninety-nine years, in turn leasing them to the parent for ten years. Improvements were made in accordance with the subsidiary's contract, and "leasehold trust certificates" were issued by an assignee of the underlying lease. The parent quit the premises before the expiration of its lease, but paid the rent for the whole period. The subsidiary then defaulted on the ninety-nine year lease, having …
Conditional Sales -Tort Liability Of Vendor For Recaption Of Property Conditionally Sold
Conditional Sales -Tort Liability Of Vendor For Recaption Of Property Conditionally Sold
Michigan Law Review
Defendant transferred a piano to plaintiff under a conditional sales contract retaining the right in case of any default in payment "to peacefully or forcibly, and without process of law, enter the premises where said property is . . . and to take . . . possession thereof." Plaintiff de-faulted in payment. Employees of defendant, entering the house of plaintiff in his absence and without notice, removed the piano. Held, plaintiff may not recover for a conversion, but may recover for a breaking and entering whether defendant's agents broke into the house with actual force, or mere technical force, …
Constitutional Law -Validity Of State Mortgage Moratorium Statutes - Effect Of Emergency
Constitutional Law -Validity Of State Mortgage Moratorium Statutes - Effect Of Emergency
Michigan Law Review
A Maryland statute provided that mortgagees holding less than a 25 per cent interest in a mortgage could not have recourse to summary remedies for sale of mortgaged property during an emergency period declared to exist until June 1, 1935. Plaintiff, the holder of such an interest in a mortgage providing for summary proceedings for sale upon default, had the right to foreclose in this manner, mortgagor having defaulted, if the statute did not bar his action. Held, the remedies denied were so interwoven with the rights contracted for that the abolition of such remedies impaired the right, and …
Bills And Notes-Alteration By Collateral Written Agreement
Bills And Notes-Alteration By Collateral Written Agreement
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was accommodation indorser on two of four notes executed at the same time with different maturity dates. As part of the same transaction, but unknown to the defendant, the maker, two other indorsers, and the payee, plaintiff in the cause, entered into an agreement in writing whereby the maturity of the unpaid notes would be accelerated on default as to any due. Held, in, an action on the notes, that instruments simultaneously executed and referring to the same subject matter are to be construed together, and the effect of such integration here was to bring about an alteration …
The Vendee's Lien- On Land And Chattels
The Vendee's Lien- On Land And Chattels
Michigan Law Review
The vendee's lien is now firmly established as an equitable device to insure full restitution to the purchaser of land on his rescission for the vendor's fraud or default. It first appeared in a dictum in an early English case where it was suggested as a possible analogy to the implied vendor's lien for the purchase money. But it was 1855 before the question was presented squarely to an English court of record, and 1860 when the House of Lords definitely approved it. Long before this, however, courts of equity in the United States had begun to μse this device …
Landlord And Tenant - Liability Of A Mortgagee In Possession Of Mortgaged Leasehold For Rent
Landlord And Tenant - Liability Of A Mortgagee In Possession Of Mortgaged Leasehold For Rent
Michigan Law Review
On default of payments under a mortgage of a leasehold, the mortgagor and mortgagee agreed that the latter was to go into possession of the premises and manage them with a view to meeting the requirements of the mortgage. The mortgagor also executed a warranty deed of the premises to the mortgagee. On default of rent payments the landlord sued the mortgagee. Held, the defendant mortgagee was in possession merely as agent of the mortgagor and as such was not liable for the rent. Cleveland v. Detroit Trust Co., 264 Mich. 253, 249 N. W. 842 (1933).
Suretyship - Interpretation Of Surety Contract
Suretyship - Interpretation Of Surety Contract
Michigan Law Review
A bank sued to recover on a surety bond for loss sustained because of fraud practised by one of the vice-presidents on a customer. The bond provided that performance was subject to certain conditions and limitations, among which was one to the effect that the bank should notify the surety within ninety days of the default. The surety was not notified until the trial four years later. Held, notification is a condition precedent to liability, even though the surety was not prejudiced by lack of notice. National City Bank v. National Security Company, (C. C. A. 6th, 1932) …
Contracts - Consideration - Agreement To Modify A Lease
Contracts - Consideration - Agreement To Modify A Lease
Michigan Law Review
Defendant leased from the plaintiff's assignor certain premises for a term of five years. After the lease was partially performed, the parties orally agreed to reduce the rent. The lessee, shortly before the expiration of the term, defaulted under the oral agreement. Plaintiff sued the defendant for the difference between the rent reserved and that which was paid under the oral agreement. Held, that an executed oral agreement, or so much of it as has been performed, will serve as a modification of a lease without regard to the presence or absence of consideration, but that which is executory …
Sales-Conditional-Resale By Seller
Sales-Conditional-Resale By Seller
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff bought a truck under a conditional sales contract. Defendant, as assignee of the vendor, retook possession of the truck when plaintiff defaulted in his payments and undertook by sale of the truck to foreclose plaintiff's rights therein. The Uniform Conditional Sales Act, in force in the jurisdiction, provided for a compulsory resale at public auction by the retaking seller. He was required to give notice of the sale by registered letter to the buyer, by newspaper advertisement, and by three notices posted in public places. Defendant failed to post the three notices. Plaintiff then brought suit for conversion and …