Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute v. Donovan (1)
- Authoritarianism (1)
- Benzene case (1)
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. EPA (1)
- Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1)
-
- Clean Air Act (1)
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. NHTSA (1)
- Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA (1)
- Cotton Dust case (1)
- De minimis exception (1)
- Default principle (1)
- Delaney Clause (1)
- Democratic justice (1)
- Endangered Species Act (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Feasibility (1)
- Grand Canyon Air Tour Coalition v. FAA (1)
- Health-health tradeoff (1)
- Hierarchical relationship (1)
- Industrial Union Department AFL-CIO v. API (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Liberal justice (1)
- Maximum contaminant level (1)
- Michigan v. EPA (1)
- Monsanto Co. v. Kennedy (1)
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA (1)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1)
- Regime change (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Reparation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cost-Benefit Default Principles, Cass R. Sunstein
Cost-Benefit Default Principles, Cass R. Sunstein
Michigan Law Review
Courts should be reluctant to apply the literal terms of a statute to mandate pointless expenditures of effort. . .. Unless Congress has been extraordinarily rigid, there is likely a basis for an implication of de minimis authority to provide exemption when the burdens of regulation yield a gain of trivial or no value. It seems bizarre that a statute intended to improve human health would .. . lock the agency into looking at only one half of a substance's health effects in determining the maximum level for that substance. [I]t is only where there is "clear congressional intent to …
Democratic Justice In Transition, Marion Smiley
Democratic Justice In Transition, Marion Smiley
Michigan Law Review
Ruti Teitel's Transitional Justice and Ian Shapiro's Democratic Justice come out of very different academic traditions. But they both develop a view of justice that might loosely be called pragmatic by virtue of its treatment of justice as a value that is simultaneously grounded in practice and powerful in bringing about social and political change. Moreover, they both use this shared pragmatic view of justice to provide us with two things that are of great importance to the study of transitional justice and democracy in general. The first is an explanatory framework for understanding how legal institutions and claims about …