Law Commons^™

Government Contracts-Adoption Of Uniform Commercial Code As The Applicable Federal Law In An Action For Breach Of Government Contract-United States V. Wegematic Corp., Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Appellant contracted to supply the Federal Reserve Board with a "truly revolutionary" electronic digital computing system. After twice requesting postponement of the delivery date, appellant informed the Board that delivery under the terms of the contract would be impracticable because of unforeseen engineering difficulties that would require at least one year and one million dollars to overcome. Appellant asked for cancellation of the contract, but the Board refused and brought a suit for damages. Both parties conceded that federal law governed the action; appellant, however, argued that section 2-615 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code) should be adopted as the …

Gift Taxes-Interest-Free Demand Loans Are Not Taxable Gifts-Johnson V. United States, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Over a period of several years, taxpayer transferred substantial amounts of money to his adult son as loans that were repayable on demand and did not bear interest. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed and collected gift taxes on the theory that taxpayer had made gifts to his son of the use of the money loaned. The value of the gift was asserted to be 3½ per cent of the average unpaid balance as of the end of each of the taxable years involved. In a suit to recover the gift taxes paid, the Federal District Court for the Northern …

Reformation And The Parol Evidence Rule, George E. Palmer

Michigan Law Review

The parol evidence rule of itself is never an obstacle to reformation, provided there is satisfactory evidence of a mistake in integration. If the parties intend to express the terms of a transaction in a writing, which is then to be looked to as the sole repository of those terms, the longstanding tradition of the law courts, described as the parol evidence rule, has been that the writing is controlling. If through mistake the writing failed to express correctly what the parties meant to express, the law courts still regarded the written word as decisive, but it has been recognized …

Actions On Commercial Paper: Holder's Procedural Advantages Under Article Three, Stanley V. Kinyon

Michigan Law Review

The discussion will also be concerned primarily with the usual action "on the instrument": an action by the holder to enforce payment by a person who has signed it as maker, acceptor, certifier, drawer, indorser, or guarantor and has thus become "liable on" it. These instruments, of course, may be involved in other types of actions, such as: an action for conversion of the instrument (section 3-419); an action to recover damages for breach of the warranties of a collector or transferor (sections 3-417 and 4-207); an action to compel indorsement (section 3-201); an action to enjoin payment (section 5-114(2)(b)); …

Protection Of The Installment Buyer Of Goods Under The Uniform Commercial Code, Robert H. Skilton, Orrin L. Helstad

Michigan Law Review

The present topic for discussion, protection of the installment buyer under the Code, is part of a larger topic-protection of the consumer under the Code. The remarks that follow sometimes apply generally to the status of the consumer under the Code. There are times when no distinction should be made between our model installment buyer and other consumer buyers.

Seller's Damages Following Resale Under Article Two Of The Uniform Commercial Code, Robert J. Nordstrom

Michigan Law Review

The seller's right to resell contracted-for goods following a breach by the buyer is set forth in section 2-706 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code). That section also contains a statement of the conditions placed upon the exercise of that right and provides the measure of recovery if the resale is made "in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner":

[T]he seller may recover the difference between the resale price and the contract price together with any incidental damages allowed under the provisions of this Article (Section 2-710), but less expenses saved in consequence of the buyer's breach.

In …

Reclamation Of Goods From A Fradulent Buyer, Robert Braucher

Michigan Law Review

Sections 2-702(2) and (3) of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code), defining the right of a seller to reclaim goods from an insolvent buyer, have for years been the subject of controversy. The sponsors of the Code have stood firm on the basic policy of these sections for more than twenty-five years, but, in its 1966 Official Recommendations for Amendment of the Uniform Commercial Code, the Permanent Editorial Board includes an amendment striking the words "or lien creditor" from section 2-702(3). That change has already been made in six states: California, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, and New York. In …

Banks And Banking-Bank's Liability For Breach Of Its Duty To Corporate Depositor-Maley V. East Side Bank Of Chicago, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The three stockholders of a close corporation contracted to sell all of the corporate stock to Shulman for $5,000 down and a balance of $17,000 in two notes payable in thirty days. A resolution filed with the defendant depositary bank provided that Paul, the former president, was to act as the interim treasurer for the corporation and was to cosign, with Shulman, all checks drawn on the corporate account until the balance of the purchase price was tendered. Approximately one week after the agreement was made, the bank received an inordinate number of inquiries regarding the credit of the corporation, …