Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Liability (2)
- Cattle (1)
- Chicago (1)
- Cobb v. South Carolina National Bank (1)
- Collusion (1)
-
- Commission (1)
- Competency (1)
- Compromise verdict (1)
- Counterclaims (1)
- Defense (1)
- Deposition (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Duvall v. Powell (1)
- Forms (1)
- Grand Jury (1)
- Guardian ad litem (1)
- Illinois (1)
- In re William Oliver (1)
- Incompetent (1)
- Interest (1)
- Johns v. League (1)
- Jury (1)
- Legal counsel (1)
- Massachusetts (1)
- Near relative (1)
- Nonresident witness (1)
- Oregon (1)
- Patton v. United States (1)
- People ex rel. Prince v. Graber (1)
- Pinball machines (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federal Courts--Third-Party "Practice--Some Jurisdictional Problems Arising Under The Amended Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Effective March 19, 1948, Chester Lloyd Jones S.Ed.
Federal Courts--Third-Party "Practice--Some Jurisdictional Problems Arising Under The Amended Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Effective March 19, 1948, Chester Lloyd Jones S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Third-party practice as originally adopted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was one of the bolder steps in the direction of integrated and complete litigation of all phases of a transaction. One of the principal problems that was forseen by the commentators and that has in fact developed in the cases is the jurisdictional limitation of the federal courts where no federal question is involved, and jurisdiction depends on diversity of citizenship or alienage. Rule 82 is explicit in stating that the Rules should be interpreted so as not to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the district courts. …
Appeal And Error-Right Of Defendant To New Trial Where Plaintiff Is Entitled To All Or None And Verdict Is Intermediate, Bruce L. Moore S.Ed.
Appeal And Error-Right Of Defendant To New Trial Where Plaintiff Is Entitled To All Or None And Verdict Is Intermediate, Bruce L. Moore S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent commission on the sale of real estate. Defendant denied the validity of the contract, and there was no issue as to the amount of liability if liability existed. The instruction to the jury was that plaintiff was entitled to 5 per cent commission if entitled to recover. The jury returned a verdict for $875, half the amount claimed. Defendant's motion for a new trial was denied. Held, although the verdict was unauthorized as to plaintiff, there was no error as to defendant …
Discovery-Procurement Of An Order Requiring A Nonresident Plaintiff To Submit To An Oral Examination Within The State Before Trial, Ralph J. Isackson
Discovery-Procurement Of An Order Requiring A Nonresident Plaintiff To Submit To An Oral Examination Within The State Before Trial, Ralph J. Isackson
Michigan Law Review
Relator, a resident of Massachusetts, brought an action in Illinois against the Railway Express Company to recover damages for the negligent transportation of the relator's cattle. After the cause was at issue the Express Company's attorneys presented a motion to respondent, a superior court judge, requesting a court order directing the nonresident relator to appear before a notary public in Chicago for the purpose of an oral examination. The court granted the order, fixing a time and place for the taking of relator's deposition on oral interrogatories. Upon failure of the relator to appear, the court stayed proceedings for a …
Constitutional Law-Procedural Due Process Denied By Michigan's "One-Man Grand Jury'', Robert J. Nordstrom
Constitutional Law-Procedural Due Process Denied By Michigan's "One-Man Grand Jury'', Robert J. Nordstrom
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner was summoned to appear as a witness before one of Oakland County's judges who was then acting in the capacity of "one-man grand juror." This proceeding was attended only by petitioner, the judge grand juror, and two other circuit judges acting as advisers to the latter. The purpose was to investigate alleged misconduct on the part of law-enforcing officials through the acceptance of bribes in the form of sales of worthless "bonds" on pin-ball machines. Petitioner admitted purchasing these "bonds" but could. not recall just what he had done with them when they had expired. Concluding that the petitioner's …
Federal Courts-Rule 20 Of Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure-Constitutionality, William B. Harvey
Federal Courts-Rule 20 Of Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure-Constitutionality, William B. Harvey
Michigan Law Review
One of the few real innovations in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is incorporated in Rule 20 which provides that a defendant who is arrested in a district other than that in which the indictment has been returned may declare in writing his desire to plead guilty and waive trial in the district of the crime. In this event, with the approval of the United States Attornies for both districts, the clerk of the court to which the indictment was returned is authorized to forward the papers to the clerk of the court for the district in which the …
Practice And Procedure-Proceedings For Restoration Of Sanity -Who May Appeal From An Adjudication Of Sanity, Chester Lloyd Jones S.Ed.
Practice And Procedure-Proceedings For Restoration Of Sanity -Who May Appeal From An Adjudication Of Sanity, Chester Lloyd Jones S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In a proceeding commenced by a guardian ad litem in a probate court to determine whether an incompetent might be adjudged sane, the committee was made respondent and resisted the adjudication of sanity. From a judgment of competency, the committee appealed to the proper court of general jurisdiction. The applicable statutes specifically gave only the petitioner the right to appeal in proceedings for restoration of sanity, but another statute gave the right to appeal from probate to circuit courts to "any person interested in any . . . decree of any probate court, and considering himself injured thereby." Petitioner moved …