Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Margaret F Brinig

Selected Works

Children

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

Adultery: Trust And Children, Margaret F. Brinig Mar 2017

Adultery: Trust And Children, Margaret F. Brinig

Margaret F Brinig

Deborah Rhode writes that while adultery is admittedly not good, it should not be criminal. She argues that it should not generate a tort action either, because the original purposes for which the torts of alienation of affections and criminal conversation come from a time with quite different views about marriage and gender, while no-fault and speedy divorce today give adequate remedies to the wronged spouse. Further, adultery should not affect employment (as a politician or in the military) unless it directly impacts job performance.

My own reluctance to disengage adultery and law stems from the seriousness of adultery. First, …


The One-Size-Fits-All Family, Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock Sep 2016

The One-Size-Fits-All Family, Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock

Margaret F Brinig

Family policy and the law based on it assume universals. That is, if marriage improves the welfare of the majority of couples and their children, it is worth pushing as a policy initiative. Further, laws will be written (or kept on the books) that privilege marriage over other family forms. Similarly, research that tells us that divorce harms children except following the relatively small number of highly conflicted marriages, spawns efforts to preserve troubled marriages or even to roll back liberal or relatively inexpensive divorce laws. With yet another example, since adopted children mostly do better than children left either …


Result Inequality In Family Law, Margaret F. Brinig Aug 2016

Result Inequality In Family Law, Margaret F. Brinig

Margaret F Brinig

To the extent that family law is governed by statute, all families are treated as though they are the same. This is of course consistent with the equal protection guarantees of the U.S. Constitution as well as those of the states. However, in our pluralistic society, all families are not alike. At birth, some children are born to wealthy, married parents who will always put the children’s interests first and will never engage in domestic violence. Many laws benefit these children, while, according to some academics, they either further disadvantage other children or at best ignore their needs. This Article …


Parental Rights And The Ugly Duckling, Margaret F. Brinig, F. H. Buckley Oct 2013

Parental Rights And The Ugly Duckling, Margaret F. Brinig, F. H. Buckley

Margaret F Brinig

No abstract provided.


Legal Status And Effect On Children, Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock Oct 2013

Legal Status And Effect On Children, Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock

Margaret F Brinig

One of the haunting claims of each poor, unmarried mother in Edin and Kefalas' Promises I Can Keep is that at least she can guarantee she will love her child, even though she cannot promise to make a lifelong commitment to a mate. That love, each young mother says, will be a sustaining gift both to her and the child. Similarly, in work done by sociologists McLanahan and Garfinkel to counteract the claim that it was not single parenting that made children's prospects dim, but poverty, sociologists have found that many of the bad effects of single parenting go away …


Finite Horizons: The American Family, Margaret F. Brinig Oct 2013

Finite Horizons: The American Family, Margaret F. Brinig

Margaret F Brinig

No abstract provided.


How Much Does Legal Status Matter? Adoptions By Kin Caregivers, Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock Oct 2013

How Much Does Legal Status Matter? Adoptions By Kin Caregivers, Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock

Margaret F Brinig

No abstract provided.


Children's Beliefs And Family Law, Margaret F. Brinig Oct 2013

Children's Beliefs And Family Law, Margaret F. Brinig

Margaret F Brinig

In a recent series of opinions authored by Justice Stevens, the Court has recognized that children may have independent religious rights, and that these may be in conflict with their parents'. The questions for this piece are whether considering children's rights independently is a good thing whether it is warranted by children's actual religious preferences and whether children's religious activities actually do anything measurable for the children.

I do not advocate that the Supreme Court become more involved with family law than it has been since the substantive due process days of Meyer and Pierce. I am also not one …