Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Class actions (3)
- Chevron (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Class Action Fairness Act (1)
- Class action (1)
-
- Class arbitration (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Contract (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Corporations (1)
- D&O (1)
- Ecuador (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Forum non conveniens (1)
- Gender (1)
- Globalization (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- International arbitration (1)
- Law firms (1)
- Legal Fiction (1)
- Legal profession (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Professional responsibility (1)
- Race (1)
- Securities (1)
- Settlement (1)
- Shareholder (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Segmented Settlements Are Not The Answer: A Response To Professor Squire’S Article, How Collective Settlements Camouflage The Costs Of Shareholder Lawsuits, Christopher C. French
Segmented Settlements Are Not The Answer: A Response To Professor Squire’S Article, How Collective Settlements Camouflage The Costs Of Shareholder Lawsuits, Christopher C. French
Journal Articles
In his recent article, Professor Richard Squire offers a provocative theory in which he claims the underlying claimants in shareholder litigation against corporate policyholders are overcompensated due to what he describes as “cramdown” settlements, under which insurers are forced to settle due to the “duty to contribute” that arises under multi-layered directors and officers (“D&O”) insurance programs. He also offers a novel idea regarding how this problem could be fixed by what he refers to as “segmented” settlements in which each insurer and the policyholder would be allowed to settle separately and consider only its own interests in doing so. …
When Bad Guys Are Wearing White Hats, Catherine A. Rogers
When Bad Guys Are Wearing White Hats, Catherine A. Rogers
Journal Articles
Allegations of ethical misconduct by lawyers have all but completely overshadowed the substantive claims in the Chevron case. While both sides have been accused of flagrant wrongdoing, the charges against plaintiffs’ counsel appear to have captured more headlines and garnered more attention. The primary reason why the focus seems lopsided is that plaintiffs’ counsel were presumed to be the ones wearing white hats in this epic drama. This essay postulates that this seeming irony is not simply an example of personal ethical lapse, but in part tied to larger reasons why ethical violations are an occupational hazard for plaintiffs’ counsel …
Living In Cafa's World, Jay Tidmarsh
Living In Cafa's World, Jay Tidmarsh
Journal Articles
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAFA on our understanding about the benefits and drawbacks of class actions. The Article describes the vision of class actions that imbues CAFA, and demonstrates how many subsequent developments in the law of class actions — including the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, and Shady Grove Orthopedics v. Allstate Insurance — have advanced CAFA’s restrictive vision about the role of class actions in modern American litigation. The Article demonstrates that competing visions about the role of class actions …
Plaintiff Control And Domination In Multidistrict Mass Torts, S. Todd Brown
Plaintiff Control And Domination In Multidistrict Mass Torts, S. Todd Brown
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
'May It Please The Court?': A Short Story, Angela Mae Kupenda
'May It Please The Court?': A Short Story, Angela Mae Kupenda
Journal Articles
This story tells a fictional account of a black woman lawyer who is about to try the biggest case of her life. While many black women lawyers seek to express their individuality and bring the best of themselves into their work and lives, conventions and norms about race and gender force them to give huge attention to things that likely matter little in the long run. In this story, we go on a journey of self-discovery with the protagonist, Angel, in hopes that she will be able to please the court in this—her trial of a lifetime.
Superiority As Unity, Jay Tidmarsh
Superiority As Unity, Jay Tidmarsh
Journal Articles
One of Professor Redish’s many important contributions to legal scholarship is his recent work on class actions. Grounding his argument in the theory of democratic accountability that has been at the centerpiece of all his work, Professor Redish suggests that, in nearly all instances, class actions violate the individual autonomy of litigants and should not be used by courts. This Essay, prepared for a festschrift in honor of Professor Redish, begins from the opposite premise: that class actions should be grounded in the notion of social utility rather than autonomy so that class actions should be used whenever they achieve …