Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Agency (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional safe harbor (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Due process (1)
-
- Imputed liability (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Marital agency (1)
- Marital property (1)
- Notice and opportunity to be heard (1)
- Pliability rules (1)
- Property (1)
- Regulatory takings (1)
- Rules (1)
- Shared liability (1)
- Spousal responsibility (1)
- Standards (1)
- Takings (1)
- Tax foreclosure (1)
- Women's property (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
In Good Times And In Debt: The Evolution Of Marital Agency And The Meaning Of Marriage, Marie T. Reilly
In Good Times And In Debt: The Evolution Of Marital Agency And The Meaning Of Marriage, Marie T. Reilly
Journal Articles
A married person sometimes acts solely for herself and at other times on behalf of her spouse. If she incurs debt solely for herself, then only she is liable to the creditor. If, however, she incurs debt both for herself and on behalf of her spouse, both are liable – the debtor directly and the spouse indirectly by imputed liability. Before married women’s property reform, imputed marital liability followed from marital status. As marriage changed to recognize the legal individuality of both spouses, so too did the scope of a spouse’s imputed liability for the debts of the other spouse. …
Bringing Clarity To Title Clearing: Tax Foreclosure And Due Process In The Internet Age, James J. Kelly Jr.
Bringing Clarity To Title Clearing: Tax Foreclosure And Due Process In The Internet Age, James J. Kelly Jr.
Journal Articles
The foreclosure of property tax liens performs an essential economic function by reconnecting underutilized properties to the real estate market. To clear title in an efficient and just manner, local jurisdictions foreclosing on tax liens require clear, balanced procedures for the provision of notice to affected parties. In its 2006 decision in Jones v. Flowers, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the foreclosing jurisdiction's lack of direct follow-up on returned notice mailings denied the addressee due process because the foreclosing party did not take steps that would be chosen by one desirous of actually informing the property owner. In subjecting …
"No Taking Without A Touching?" Questions From An Armchair Originalist, Nicole Stelle Garnett
"No Taking Without A Touching?" Questions From An Armchair Originalist, Nicole Stelle Garnett
Journal Articles
This paper is an invited contribution to the Bernard Siegan Memorial Conference on Economic Liberties, Property Rights, and the Original Meaning of the Constitution at the University of San Diego School of Law. The paper poses three questions about the historical evidence used to support the dominant academic view that the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, as originally understood, extended only to physical appropriations or invasions of private property. First, the paper questions the relevance of state and local regulatory practices to the pre-incorporation understanding of the Takings Clause. Second, the paper expresses concern about the use of state-court cases decided …