Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Law and religion (2)
- ADEA (1)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Age discrimination (1)
- Asteriod and comet impacts (1)
-
- Book review (1)
- Commentary (1)
- Disparate impact theory (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Establishment clause (1)
- Initial National Response Plan (1)
- Judicial decision making (1)
- Law of planetary defense (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal indeterminacy (1)
- Lucinda Peach (1)
- Precautionary principle (1)
- Reasonable factors other than age (1)
- Religious pluralism (1)
- Space law (1)
- Symposium (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Future Of Affirmative Action, Wendy B. Scott
The Future Of Affirmative Action, Wendy B. Scott
Journal Articles
The author served as the moderator of a panel at the Symposium entitled Twenty-Five Years: The Future of Affirmative Action. In this Commentary, she reviews articles by Professors Kevin Brown, Leland Ware, and John Valery Mute appearing elsewhere in this Issue.
Lessons Learned By A New Dean, Jim Rosenblatt
Lessons Learned By A New Dean, Jim Rosenblatt
Journal Articles
The account of my first year as dean of the Mississippi College School of Law in no way should focus on me as an individual, for my life and my decanal endeavors were inextricably woven into the life of the law school. The account of my first year as a "new dean" must, therefore, be a recounting of the events and activities of the law school in the academic year 2003-2004. Through this brief account, I shall share the story of the law school from my perspective and along the way recount the lessons I have learned and the nuggets …
Book Review, Mark C. Modak-Truran
Book Review, Mark C. Modak-Truran
Journal Articles
Lucinda Peach addresses the issue of religious lawmaking by focusing on the constitutional implications and gender issues that she argues have been overlooked by the Supreme Court and by participants in the debate about religion in politics.
Rehabilitate The Age Discrimination In Employment Act: Resuscitate The “Reasonable Factors Other Than Age” Defense And The Disparate Impact Theory, Judith J. Johnson
Rehabilitate The Age Discrimination In Employment Act: Resuscitate The “Reasonable Factors Other Than Age” Defense And The Disparate Impact Theory, Judith J. Johnson
Journal Articles
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) promised to protect older workers from discriminatory exclusion from the workforce, but recent studies show that older workers are being cut from the workforce and are unable to find employment. In a 1995 article, I warned of the potential dangers of construing the ADEA to allow employment decisions based on age-correlated criteria. Most courts have failed to heed these warnings and now approve employer practices, such as terminating employees based on higher salaries and refusing to hire workers with too much experience. These practices may explain the difficulty older workers are having retaining …
The Precautionary Principle As The Law Of Planetary Defense: Achieving The Mandate To Defend The Earth Against Asteroid And Comet Impacts While There Is Still Time, Evan R. Seamone
Journal Articles
Current legal and policy efforts to enable adequate defense against potential asteroid or comet collisions with the earth are insufficient because they are indirectly premised upon theories that require verification of a clear and imminent threat before governmental agencies can act. This Article identifies the "precautionary principle" as the preeminent law of planetary defense against asteroid and comet impacts. The precautionary principle requires governments to take action to prevent harm even when it is uncertain if, when, or where the harm will occur. It requires governments to implement specific frameworks for making prompt decisions, directs intergovernmental bodies to plan for …
Reenchanting The Law: The Religious Dimension Of Judicial Decision Making, Mark C. Modak-Truran
Reenchanting The Law: The Religious Dimension Of Judicial Decision Making, Mark C. Modak-Truran
Journal Articles
Without a religious justification in the law, judges cannot fully justify their decisions in hard cases from within the law. The law must be indeterminate because the Establishment Clause proscribes this full justification. This does not mean that the Establishment Clause prohibits judges from fully justifying their decisions during their deliberations about hard cases. It only prohibits judges from including that full justification in their written opinions. Deliberation and explanation are separate stages of judicial decision making that should be kept distinct. Given this distinction, my thesis is that judges should fully justify their decisions in hard cases by relying …