Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
On Foxes And Hedgehogs, Roger P. Alford
On Foxes And Hedgehogs, Roger P. Alford
Journal Articles
This Article is about John Nagle’s many means to one great end. It will outline the many themes of his scholarship: (i) environmental law, (ii) statutory interpretation, (iii) constitutional law, (iv) nuisance and pollution, (v) election law and campaign finance, (vi) Christianity and the environment, and (vii) national parks. It will offer conclusions on how he used his scholarly interests as a means to pursue his overarching worldview.
Cercla's Mistakes, John C. Nagle
Cercla's Mistakes, John C. Nagle
Journal Articles
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) confounds every theory of statutory interpretation. Congress hurriedly enacted CERCLA during the lame-duck period following the election of President Reagan and a Republican Senate majority in November 1980 but before they took office in January 1981. The resulting statute has been criticized for its apparently textual mistakes, sparse legislative history, conflicting purposes, and questionable public policy. Courts routinely complain about the difficulty of interpreting CERCLA under those circumstances. This article reviews several of the interpretive challenges presented by CERCLA, and suggests some broader implications for statutory interpretation more generally. CERCLA, hazardous …
Cercla, Causation, And Responsibility, John C. Nagle
Cercla, Causation, And Responsibility, John C. Nagle
Journal Articles
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA") and causation have enjoyed an uneasy coexistence. The tension between them results from the circumstances in which CERCLA became law. The Congress that enacted CERCLA considered two alternative liability schemes, both of which required that "polluters pay" for the cleanup of hazardous wastes. The House proposed imposing liability on those who "caused or contributed" to hazardous waste problems, while the Senate looked to specifically designated "responsible parties." The Senate prevailed. The consequences of that choice for the traditional tort concept of causation, like many other questions left unanswered in …