Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 4th Amendment (1)
- Arms control (1)
- Atrocities (1)
- Crimes against humanity -- Lawsuits & claims (1)
- Domestic courts & international law (1)
-
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Genocide -- Lawsuits & claims (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
- International crimes (1)
- JAG (1)
- Judge Advocate General (1)
- Judicial opinions (1)
- Katz v. United States (Supreme Court case) (1)
- Lawyer-Creep (1)
- Lawyering war (1)
- National Security (1)
- National security (1)
- National-security legal system (1)
- Risk aversion (1)
- Searches & seizures (Law) (1)
- State courts (1)
- United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (1)
- War crimes -- Lawsuits & claims (1)
- Weapons of mass destruction -- Government policy (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Lawyering Wars: Failing Leadership, Risk Aversion, And Lawyer Creep—Should We Expect More Lone Survivors?, Arthur Rizer
Lawyering Wars: Failing Leadership, Risk Aversion, And Lawyer Creep—Should We Expect More Lone Survivors?, Arthur Rizer
Indiana Law Journal
“We are a nation of laws, not men.” This motto—made famous by the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison1—has existed since the founding of the United States. This maxim embodies the sentiment that, in order to prevent tyranny, citizens should be governed by fixed law rather than the whims of a dictator. In his decision, Chief Justice John Marshall did not qualify his remarks by saying, “we are a nation of laws, except in time of war.” Indeed with the modern U.S. military, Cicero’s observation that “[l]aws are inoperative in war” has never been further from the truth. Never before …
Big Fish, Small Ponds: International Crimes In National Courts, Elizabeth B. Ludwin King
Big Fish, Small Ponds: International Crimes In National Courts, Elizabeth B. Ludwin King
Indiana Law Journal
The principle of complementarity in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court anticipates that perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity will be tried in domestic courts unless there is no state with jurisdiction willing or able to do so. This Article examines the situation where a state might be willing to engage in meaningful local justice but temporarily lacks the capability to do so due to the effects of the conflict. It argues that where the state submits a detailed proposal to the International Criminal Court (ICC) outlining the steps necessary to gain or regain the …
Consequence, Weapons Of Mass Destruction, And The Fourth Amendment's "No-Win" Scenario, Scott J. Glick
Consequence, Weapons Of Mass Destruction, And The Fourth Amendment's "No-Win" Scenario, Scott J. Glick
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.