Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (2)
- Abortion -- Law & legislation -- Congresses (1)
- Addison C. Harris (1)
- Addison C. Harris Lecture (1)
- Article III (1)
-
- Barack Obama 1961- (1)
- Conservative Plaintiffs (1)
- Constitutional law -- United States -- Congresses (1)
- Excise tax (1)
- Health Care (1)
- Indiana University (1)
- Legislative Bodies (1)
- Marriage Equality (1)
- Medical & Dental & Hospital Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers (1)
- Medical equipment -- Taxation (1)
- Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing (1)
- Medical equipment industry -- United States -- Taxation (1)
- Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance (1)
- Pro-choice movement -- Congresses (1)
- Professional machinery and equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers (1)
- Repeal of legislation (1)
- Reproductive Rights (1)
- Roe v. Wade (Supreme Court case) (1)
- Same-sex marriage -- California (1)
- Standing Doctrine (1)
- Standing Lessons (1)
- Stem cell research -- United States (1)
- Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing (1)
- Taxation economics (1)
- United States Congress (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Medical Device Excise Tax: An Unfair Burden, Elizabeth M. Bolka
The Medical Device Excise Tax: An Unfair Burden, Elizabeth M. Bolka
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Abortion And The “Woman Question”: Forty Years Of Debate, Reva B. Siegel
Abortion And The “Woman Question”: Forty Years Of Debate, Reva B. Siegel
Indiana Law Journal
This paper was presented as the Addison C. Harris Lecture at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Bloomington, Indiana, September 27, 2012.
Further Standing Lessons, Heather Elliott
Further Standing Lessons, Heather Elliott
Indiana Law Journal
Professor Elliott wrote a piece for the Indiana Law Journal in 2012 (available here). In this article, she updates her analysis and explores the implications of both the health-care and marriage equality cases on the Court’s standing doctrine.