Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Elections (7)
- First Amendment (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutional interpretation (2)
-
- Courts (2)
- Domicile and residence (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Gentile v. State (2)
- Gerrymandering (2)
- Indiana (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Politics (2)
- Provincial courts of law (2)
- Statutes -- Indiana (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- 130 S. Ct. 876 (1)
- 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014) (1)
- 1970 Voting Rights Act (1)
- 2000 Presidential Election (1)
- 2016 Election (1)
- A Global Perspective (1)
- Abortion Law (1)
- Addison C. Harris (1)
- Administrative courts (1)
- American Civil War (1)
- American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees (1)
- American Politics (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Arizona (1)
Articles 1 - 26 of 26
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gerrymandering & Justiciability: The Political Question Doctrine After Rucho V. Common Cause, G. Michael Parsons
Gerrymandering & Justiciability: The Political Question Doctrine After Rucho V. Common Cause, G. Michael Parsons
Indiana Law Journal
This Article deconstructs Rucho’s articulation and application of the political question doctrine and makes two contributions. First, the Article disentangles the political question doctrine from neighboring justiciability doctrines. The result is a set of substantive principles that should guide federal courts as they exercise a range of routine judicial functions—remedial, adjudicative, and interpretive. Rather than unrealistically attempting to draw crisp jurisdictional boundaries between exercises of “political” and “judicial” power, the political question doctrine should seek to moderate their inevitable (and frequent) clash. Standing doctrine should continue to guide courts in determining whether they have authority over a case involving a …
The Changing Face Of Terrorism And The Designation Of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, Patrick J. Keenan
The Changing Face Of Terrorism And The Designation Of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, Patrick J. Keenan
Indiana Law Journal
In this Article, I take up one slice of what should be a broad re-examination of
U.S. law and policy. I argue that the new attacks have been undertaken by entities
that can and should be designated as foreign terrorist organizations. Doing this would
permit prosecutors to target those who support these entities with tools that are not
currently available. This Article is both a doctrinal argument that directly addresses
the many legal hurdles that make designating groups, such as foreign hackers and
troll farms, terrorist organizations a complicated endeavor, and a policy argument
about how U.S. law and policy …
Speech Inequality After Janus V. Afscme, Charlotte Garden
Speech Inequality After Janus V. Afscme, Charlotte Garden
Indiana Law Journal
This Article explores the growing divide between the Roberts Court’s treatment of the free speech rights of wealthy individuals and corporations in campaign finance cases as compared to its treatment of the rights of public-sector labor unions and their members. First, it highlights some internal contradictions in the Janus Court’s analysis. Then, it discusses the growing—yet mostly ignored—divergence in the Court’s treatment of corporate and labor speakers with respect to the use of market influence to achieve political influence.
The Article has two Parts. In Part I, I explain how the Court reached its decision in Janus before critiquing the …
The Democracy Ratchet, Derek T. Muller
The Democracy Ratchet, Derek T. Muller
Indiana Law Journal
This Article proceeds in five Parts. Part I identifies recent instances in which federal courts have invoked a version of the Democracy Ratchet. It identifies the salient traits of the Democracy Ratchet in these cases. Part II describes why the Democracy Ratchet has gained attention, primarily as a tactic of litigants and as a convenient benchmark in preliminary injunction cases. Part III examines the history of the major federal causes of action concerning election administration—Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the Burdick balancing test, and the Equal Protection Clause. In each, it traces the path of the doctrine to …
The Recent Unpleasantness: Understanding The Cycles Of Constitutional Time, Jack M. Balkin
The Recent Unpleasantness: Understanding The Cycles Of Constitutional Time, Jack M. Balkin
Indiana Law Journal
In this Article, I will talk about what I expect is going to happen in the next five to ten years. Unlike eclipses, however, one can’t be entirely sure of the future. Politics is not astronomy, and human affairs do not operate like clockwork. Moreover, we can’t assume that everything is already foreordained: that if people simply sit on their hands and do nothing, the cycles I describe in this lecture will take care of themselves. Quite the contrary. I am telling a story about what happens in the long run, but it is not a deterministic story. The actions …
Whistleblowing Speech And The First Amendment, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
Whistleblowing Speech And The First Amendment, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
Indiana Law Journal
Alexander Meiklejohn, the iconic First Amendment scholar who expounded the democratic self-government theory of the freedom of speech, posited that for demo-cratic self-government to function, the voters themselves must possess the infor-mation necessary to hold the government accountable. Yet, the information neces-sary for the citizenry to render wise electoral verdicts not uncommonly belongs to the government itself, and government officials often prove highly reluctant to share information that reflects badly on them and their work. The lack of critically im-portant information about the government’s performance makes it difficult, if not impossible, for voters to hold government accountable on Election Day. …
Undue Burdens And Potential Opportunities In Voting Rights And Abortion Law, Pamela S. Karlan
Undue Burdens And Potential Opportunities In Voting Rights And Abortion Law, Pamela S. Karlan
Indiana Law Journal
One of the problems with the way we have tried to build a more just constitutional law is our failure to see, and then to make the most of, doctrinal connections across constitutional subfields—that is, to build constitutional bridges. This Essay seeks to build one such bridge between two areas of legal doctrine that might seem relatively disconnected from one another: voting rights and reproductive justice.
Many years ago, I joked about one aspect of that connection: “Redistricting, like reproduction, combines lofty goals, deep passions about identity and instincts for self-preservation, increasing reliance on technology, and often a need to …
The Next Reapportionment Revolution, Ashira Ostrow
The Next Reapportionment Revolution, Ashira Ostrow
Indiana Law Journal
In the 1960s, the Supreme Court famously imposed the one-person, one-vote requirement on federal, state, and local legislatures. The doctrine rapidly resolved the problem of malapportioned districts. Within just a few years, legislatures across the nation were reapportioned to equalize the population between districts. Sadly, however, the national commitment to equal-population districts has led directly to the current crisis of political gerrymandering. The boundaries of equal-population districts must be redrawn every ten years to maintain population equality. Even with rigid adherence to population requirements, district boundaries are easily manipulated to secure incumbent seats and advance partisan interests. Redistricting is rightly …
One Person, One Vote: Gerrymandering And The Independent Commission, A Global Perspective, James Ruley
One Person, One Vote: Gerrymandering And The Independent Commission, A Global Perspective, James Ruley
Indiana Law Journal
In 1863, on the hallowed fields at Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln encapsulated a core principle of democracy by describing our system as a “government of the people, by the people, [and] for the people.” This definition accurately depicts the ideal of democracy—that supreme power is vested in the citizenry, not in the government itself. Since the American model is based on representative democracy instead of direct democracy, extreme scrutiny must be placed upon the system of choosing representatives if government is to accurately represent the will of the people.
One of the greatest abuses of a citizen’s voting rights is gerrymandering. …
Voter Welfare: An Emerging Rule Of Reason In Voting Rights Law, Samuel Issacharoff
Voter Welfare: An Emerging Rule Of Reason In Voting Rights Law, Samuel Issacharoff
Indiana Law Journal
For the first time in at least a generation, the central focus of voting rights law has returned to the issue of eligibility to cast a ballot and the act of voting itself. Unlike in prior generations, the fights over voting are centrally part of a partisan battle for electoral supremacy and are not organized around perpetuating the historic sub-ordination of minority populations—whatever the localized impact on minorities that the new voting rules may trigger. In the partisan environment, courts face claims of exclusion that only imperfectly map onto constitutional prohibitions of discrimina-tory intent or statutory protections of minority voting …
Scrutinizing Federal Electoral Qualifications, Derek T. Muller
Scrutinizing Federal Electoral Qualifications, Derek T. Muller
Indiana Law Journal
Candidates for federal office must meet several constitutional qualifications. Sometimes, whether a candidate meets those qualifications is a matter of dispute. Courts and litigants often assume that a state has the power to include or exclude candidates from the ballot on the basis of the state’s own scrutiny of candidates’ qualifications. Courts and litigants also often assume that the matter is not left to the states but to Congress or another political actor. But those contradictory assumptions have never been examined, until now.
This Article compiles the mandates of the Constitution, the precedents of Congress, the practices of states administering …
Citizens Disunited: Mccutcheon V. Federal Election Commission, Adam Lamparello
Citizens Disunited: Mccutcheon V. Federal Election Commission, Adam Lamparello
Indiana Law Journal
The wealthy are democracy’s darlings, the middle class are its stepchildren, and the poor are its orphans. Corporate giants line the pockets of senatorial candidates—and purchase influence—while average citizens walk into a polling station and cast a largely symbolic vote. Stated simply, money creates a soft inequality by dominating the political process. Like the “soft bigotry of low expectations,”69 the soft inequality embedded in our political system has created a liberty gap between the prosperous and the poor. McCutcheon was an opportunity to bridge this gap. Instead, the Court enshrined the status quo by holding that Congress could only regulate …
Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis Of Independent Political Spending, Douglas M. Spencer, Abby Wood
Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis Of Independent Political Spending, Douglas M. Spencer, Abby Wood
Indiana Law Journal
What effect has Citizens United v. FEC had on independent spending in American politics? Previous attempts to answer this question have focused solely on federal elections, where there is no baseline for comparing changes in spending behavior. We overcome this limitation by examining the effects of Citizens United as a natural experiment on the states. Before Citizens United, about half of the states banned corporate independent expenditures and thus were “treated” by the Supreme Court’s decision, which invalidated these state laws. We rely on recently released state-level data to compare spending in “treated” states to spending in the “control” states, …
Procedural Fairness In Election Contests, Joshua A. Douglas
Procedural Fairness In Election Contests, Joshua A. Douglas
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Community As A Redistricting Principle: Consulting Media Markets In Drawing District Lines, Jason C. Miller
Community As A Redistricting Principle: Consulting Media Markets In Drawing District Lines, Jason C. Miller
Indiana Law Journal
With the 2011 redistricting process poised to commence across the country, debates are raging as to who should draw district lines, how to keep those individuals from drawing them for partisan advantage, and the best way to draw minority districts. This paper addresses the largely overlooked area of media markets. Districts drawn to conform with media markets experience higher voter turnout. Moreover, linking a city and its economically-connected suburbs together is simply common sense. Discussing the impact of district conformity, or lack thereof, with media market boundaries on campaign strategy, news reporting, voter participation, grassroots organizing, and candidate recruitment, this …
"Be Careful What You Ask For": The 2000 Presidential Election, The U.S. Supreme Court, And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley, Joseph L. Hoffmann
"Be Careful What You Ask For": The 2000 Presidential Election, The U.S. Supreme Court, And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
State Campaign Finance Schemes And Equal Protection, John M. Hamilton
State Campaign Finance Schemes And Equal Protection, John M. Hamilton
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Union Representation Election Statements: A Call For Implementation Of The Statute, Bruce Charles Navarro
Union Representation Election Statements: A Call For Implementation Of The Statute, Bruce Charles Navarro
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Durational Residency Requirements In State Elections: Blumstein V. Ellington, James R. Fisher
Durational Residency Requirements In State Elections: Blumstein V. Ellington, James R. Fisher
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Impact And Constitutionality Of Voter Residence Requirements As Applied To Certain Intrastate Movers, Nicholas K. Brown
The Impact And Constitutionality Of Voter Residence Requirements As Applied To Certain Intrastate Movers, Nicholas K. Brown
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection And Tenure In Indiana: A Critical Analysis And Suggested Reform
Judicial Selection And Tenure In Indiana: A Critical Analysis And Suggested Reform
Indiana Law Journal
Indiana's method of selecting its judiciary by the partisan election process has for years been considered wholly inadequate by those who have given it serious thought. Yet that system persists, notwithstanding many efforts at legislative reform. The Editors of the Indiana Law Journal feel it is the responsibility of all citizens, attorneys and judges to continually seek adoption of the most sound method of selecting and retaining in public office those entrusted with the responsibility of administering justice. The following nwte is presented as one writer's evaluation of the present system and its alternatives, in the hope that it will …
The Privilege Of A Negro Citizen To Vote In A Primary
The Privilege Of A Negro Citizen To Vote In A Primary
Indiana Law Journal
Notes and Comments: Constitutional Law
Special Municipal Election Laws
"Skip Election Law" Of 1941 Held Invalid Special Legislation
"Skip Election Law" Of 1941 Held Invalid Special Legislation
Indiana Law Journal
Notes and Comments: Legislation
A "Majority Of The Electors" Means A Majority Of Those Voting On The Question, Frank N. Richman
A "Majority Of The Electors" Means A Majority Of Those Voting On The Question, Frank N. Richman
Indiana Law Journal
(A criticism of State v. Swift, 69 Ind. 505; In re Denny, 156 Ind. 104; In re Boswell, 179 Ind. 292)
The Indianapolis Mayoralty Cases, Robert C. Brown
The Indianapolis Mayoralty Cases, Robert C. Brown
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.