Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 18 U.S.C. § 249 (1)
- 347 U.S. 483 (1)
- African Americans -- Education -- History (1)
- Amish (1)
- Amish -- Legal status and laws etc. (1)
-
- Berea College -- History (1)
- Blacks -- United States -- Legal status laws etc. (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1)
- Causation (Criminal law) -- Standards (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil rights -- United States -- Cases (1)
- Crime analysis (1)
- Criminal law -- Interpretation & construction (1)
- Deliberate Speed (1)
- Educational equalization -- United States -- Lawsuits & claims (1)
- Etc. (1)
- HCPA (1)
- Harris Lecture (1)
- Hate crime analysis (1)
- Hate crimes (1)
- Hate crimes -- United States -- Religious aspects (1)
- Integration (1)
- Julian Bond (1)
- Legal marriage (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Marriage law (1)
- Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (1)
- Private law (1)
- Rule of lenity (Law) (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Method Of Attack: A Supplemental Model For Hate Crime Analysis, Angela D. Moore
Method Of Attack: A Supplemental Model For Hate Crime Analysis, Angela D. Moore
Indiana Law Journal
On October 28, 2009, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA) was signed into law by President Barack Obama. Two years later, between September and November of 2011, members of a Bergholz, Ohio, Amish community allegedly carried out five attacks in which they forcibly restrained, and cut the hair and beards of, members of other Amish communities. In September of 2012, a jury rendered a verdict in United States v. Mullet and found sixteen members of the Bergholz community—including Samuel Mullet, bishop of the community—guilty of HCPA violations. These were the first convictions for religion-based …
With All Deliberate Speed: Brown V. Board Of Education, Julian Bond
With All Deliberate Speed: Brown V. Board Of Education, Julian Bond
Indiana Law Journal
Julian Bond, former president of the NAACP and the first president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, delivered the Indiana University Maurer School of Law’s Harris Lecture on Oct. 15, 2014 in the school’s Moot Court Room. Bond’s presentation, “The Broken Promise of Brown,” was part of the school’s commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
Why The State Cannot “Abolish Marriage”: A Partial Defense Of Legal Marriage, Gregg P. Strauss
Why The State Cannot “Abolish Marriage”: A Partial Defense Of Legal Marriage, Gregg P. Strauss
Indiana Law Journal
Does a liberal state have a legitimate interest in defining the terms of intimate relationships? Recently, several scholars have answered this question with a no and concluded that the state should abolish marriage, along with all other categories of intimate status. While politically infeasible, these proposals offer a powerful thought experiment. In this Article, I use this thought experiment to argue that the law cannot avoid relying on intimate-status norms and has legitimate reasons to retain an intimate status like marriage.
The argument has three parts. The primary lesson of the thought experiment is that the state cannot abolish intimate …