Law Commons^™

The Sentinel Stirs: Government Procurement Law After Loper Bright Enterprises, Christopher R. Yukins, Kristen Ittig, Nicole Williamson

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Administrative law – and by extension, government procurement law – is in a period of transition in the United States. The judiciary, sometimes alarmed by the perceived excesses of the administrative state, is reexamining the deference traditionally afforded agency interpretations of law. As part of that transition, the Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (June 2024) overruled the test it first established in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984), which held that if a statute was ambiguous, the courts would defer to an agency’s reading of that statute so long as the agency’s interpretation was reasonable. This …

Brief Of Amici Curiae Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Petitioner In Sec V. Jarkesy, Ronald M. Levin, Alan B. Morrison, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This is an amicus brief that several scholars have filed in the Supreme Court in SEC v. Jarkesy. The brief argues that (1) the double-for-cause removal requirement of Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB should not apply to ALJs at the SEC; and (2) the Seventh Amendment does not apply to administrative adjudication at the SEC.

Delegated Agency Authority To Address Chemicals Of Emerging Concern: Epa’S Strategic Use Of Emergency Powers To Address Pfas Air Pollution, Robert L. Glicksman, Johanna Adashek

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

PFAS are a class of chemicals that pose some of the most serious and multifaceted health and environmental threats of the past century. Manufactured since the 1940s, used in everyday products from non-stick cookware, to fire-fighting foams, to makeup and shaving cream, and found in even the most remote parts of the world, PFAS are ubiquitous. The most thoroughly-studied PFAS have demonstrable serious health effects that include reproductive and developmental dysfunctions, interference with the body’s hormonal and immune systems, suppression of vaccine responsiveness, and links to various types of cancers. In response to scientists’ identification of the multitude of health …

To Find The Best Future System Of Agency Adjudication We Should Return To The Past, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Professor Pierce wrote this essay for inclusion in a symposium on the future of agency adjudication:

In 1946, Congress and the Supreme Court unanimously embraced a method of conducting agency adjudications. We abandoned that method gradually through a variety of steps that we have taken in the ensuing years. We should return to the original model for conducting agency adjudications.

In section one, I describe and evaluate the method of agency adjudication that Congress adopted in the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 after years of study and debate. In section two, I describe and criticize the changes that we have …

U.S. Department Of Justice Executive Branch Engagement On Litigating The Administrative Procedure Act, Aram Gavoor, Steven A. Pratt

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The Administrative Procedure Act is a broadly worded statute that has benefitted from caselaw to fill many of its gaps, ambiguities, and inconsistencies. But the case method directs judicial attention to slivers of APA inquiry that are required to resolve cases in as-applied challenges to rules and adjudications. There is another method of APA interpretation that has never been deployed in the statute’s 77-year life—that of intentional collaboration between the executive branch and the judiciary. Acting on their litigation and case management authorities as well as their unique power to persuade the judiciary on questions of administrative procedure, the Attorney …

How Should The Court Respond To The Combination Of Political Polarity, Legislative Impotence, And Executive Branch Overreach?, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In this essay, Professor Pierce discusses two related problems that the Supreme Court must address—the large increase in nationwide preliminary injunctions issued by district judges to prohibit the executive branch from implementing major federal actions and the large increase in the number of cases in which the Supreme Court either stays or refuses to stay preliminary injunctions without providing an adequate explanation for its action. He begins by describing the sources of the two problems and the many ways in which they threaten our system of justice. He then urges the Court to issue an opinion in which it provides …

Judicial Review Of Scientific Uncertainty In Climate Change Lawsuits: Deferential And Nondeferential Evaluation Of Agency Factual And Policy Determinations, Robert L. Glicksman, Daniel Kim, Keziah Groth-Tuft

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Scientific determinations are often at the heart of environmental disputes. When those disputes take the form of litigation, the courts may be called on to determine whether an administrative agency’s treatment of the science warrants deference. For several reasons, judges are inclined to apply deferential review to agency factual and policy science-based determinations. Most judges are not trained in the language and methods of science. They may be reluctant to intervene on matters on which their lack of expertise risks producing uninformed judgments. If a statute delegates to an agency the responsibility of making those determinations, courts may be loath …

Artificial Intelligence Accountability Of Public Administration, Francesca Bignami

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This article canvasses the use and regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in US administrative agencies. It is structured as a reply to the questionnaire circulated in advance of the 2022 International Congress of Comparative Law for purposes of preparing the national reports and the general report on the topic of “Artificial Intelligence Accountability of Public Administration.” In large part, the questionnaire’s point of reference is the comprehensive regulation of AI in the European Union’s proposed AI Act. The US reply, contained in this article, highlights the many lacunae in US regulation of AI, similar to the US’s patchwork approach to …

An Expanded Version Of Oira Can Ensure Democratic Accountability In The Administrative State, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In this contribution to a symposium, Professor Pierce argues that the most promising way of ensuring democratic accountability in the administrative state is to combine an expanded version of OIRA with complementary doctrines.

Can The Federal Trade Commission Use Rulemaking To Change Antitrust Law?, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Lina Khan, the new Chair of the FTC, proposes to use notice and comment rulemaking to make major changes in antitrust law by declaring many practices to be “unfair methods of competition” within the meaning of that term in section five of the FTC Act. She has the strong backing of President Biden and her Democrat colleagues. That raises two questions. Does the FTC have the power to use the notice and comment process to implement Section five? If it has that power, can it use the rulemaking process to make the major changes in antitrust law that Chair Khan …

The Impending Judicial Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence In The Administrative State, Aram A. Gavoor

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms are being deployed in executive branch agencies at a brisk pace and with no executive branch account for their use. The proliferation of AI in government raises civil rights concerns because it has been found—at a general level—to succumb to racial and gender biases when AI algorithms are incompetently or intentionally trained. Policy solutions have been put forth to mitigate the issue of such AI uses in government, some of which are in the process of being implemented. Despite these gains, the political branches of the federal government have limited time to act before their primary …

In Search Of The Presumption Of Regularity, Aram A. Gavoor, Steven Platt

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The presumption of regularity is an imprecise quasi-deference principle that federal courts apply in varying ways to presume federal officers and employees lawfully and consistently discharge their official duties. The presumption gained national significance during the Trump Administration in several key cases in which it was implicated, but never described by the Supreme Court. While the literature and judicial opinions have invoked the presumption, there has been sparse scholarly accounting for its contours, value, and legitimacy. This Article is the first to trace the contemporary domain of the presumption and its applications from its pre-Founding Era source and normatively-recognized 1926 …

Administrative Investigations, Aram A. Gavoor, Steven Platt

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This Article establishes the subject of federal administrative investigations as a new area of study in administrative law. While the literature has addressed investigations by specific agencies and congressional investigations, there is no general account for the trans-substantive constitutional value of administrative investigations. This Article provides such an account by exploring the positive law, agency behaviors, and constraints pertaining to this unresearched field. It concludes with some urgency that the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946—the statute that stands as a bill of rights for the Administrative State—does not serve to regulate administrative investigations and that the Article III courts have …

Material Liberty And The Administrative State: Market And Social Rights In American And German Law, Francesca Bignami

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This chapter begins with a forgotten story from American constitutional law. Raymond Belcher worked for a coal mining company in Lynco, West Virginia. During his working life, he paid into the federal insurance scheme for disability—Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). Belcher later broke his neck on the job and claimed on his federal SSDI insurance. But he was in for a bad surprise. In 1965, after he began contributing but before he became disabled, Congress enacted an “offset” provision to reduce benefits for individuals like him who qualified for both state-run worker’s compensation and federal SSDI. Belcher went all the …

Consume Or Invest: What Do/Should Agency Leaders Maximize?, William E. Kovacic, David A. Hyman

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In the regulatory state, agency leaders face a fundamental choice: should they “consume” or should they “invest?” “Consume” means launching high profile cases and rule-making. “Invest” means developing and nurturing the necessary infrastructure for the agency to handle whatever the future may bring. The former brings headlines, while the latter will be completely ignored. Unsurprisingly, consumption is routinely prioritized, and investment is deferred, downgraded, or overlooked entirely. This essay outlines the incentives for agency leadership to behave in this way and explores the resulting agency costs (pun intended). The U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s health care portfolio provides a useful case …

Can't Anyone Here Play This Game? Judging The Ftc's Critics, David A. Hyman, William E. Kovacic

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The conventional wisdom is that the FTC was the governmental equivalent of a leper colony prior to 1969, and its credibility and reputation were restored only by the adoption of the wise recommendations in the 1969 ABA Report. There is no question that the FTC deserves plenty of criticism for its pre-1969 performance. It is also beyond doubt that there has been a dramatic turn-around in the intervening forty-five years, as the FTC adopted the recommendations in the 1969 Report. But, before we simply genuflect at the wisdom of those responsible for the ABA Report and the inherent virtue of …

Comparative Administrative Law, Francesca Bignami

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This chapter provides an overview of comparative administrative law, with particular attention to European jurisdictions and the United States. The underlying conceptual similarity that serves to organize the comparative analysis is the purpose, common to these systems, of rendering public administration both capable and expert, on the one hand, and accountable to a variety of liberal democratic actors, on the other hand. The chapter first discusses what historically was the principal legal tool for achieving neutrality and expertise—the legal guarantees of civil service employment—together with national variations in the professionalization of administration. It then turns to three important types of …

Behavioral Economics: Implications For Regulatory Behavior, William E. Kovacic, James C. Cooper

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Behavioral economics (BE) examines the implications for decision-making when actors suffer from biases documented in the psychological literature. This article considers how such biases affect regulatory decisions. The article posits a simple model of a regulator who serves as an agent to a political overseer. The regulator chooses a policy that accounts for the rewards she receives from the political overseer — whose optimal policy is assumed to maximize short-run outputs that garner political support, rather than long-term welfare outcomes — and the weight the regulator puts on the optimal long run policy. Flawed heuristics and myopia are likely to …

Agency-Specific Precedents, Robert L. Glicksman, Robert E. Levy

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

As a field of legal study and practice, administrative law rests on the premise that legal principles concerning agency structure, administrative process, and judicial review cut across multiple agencies. In practice, however, judicial precedents addressing the application of administrative law doctrines to a given agency tend to rely most heavily on other cases involving the same agency, and use verbal formulations or doctrinal approaches reflected in those cases. Over time, the doctrine often begins to develop its own unique characteristics when applied to that particular agency. These “agency-specific precedents” deviate from the conventional understanding of the relevant principles as a …

Outsourcing Immigration Compliance, Eleanor Marie Brown

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Immigration is a hot button issue about which Americans have sent a clear message. They prefer not to admit more aliens until the government is able to credibly screen for entrants who will abide by the terms of admission and sanction those who do not. While immigration debates now focus almost entirely on undocumented workers, they have overshadowed another critical, yet poorly understood challenge: designing institutions to properly screen for aliens who are visa-compliant and sanction non-compliant aliens. Because failed guest worker programs unquestionably increase the size of the undocumented population, this article addresses the difficulty of institutional design by …

Process-Based Preemption, Bradford R. Clark

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The question of preemption arises because the Constitution establishes a federal system with two governments (one federal and one state) that have overlapping power to regulate the same matters involving the same parties in the same territory. To succeed, such a system requires a means of deciding when federal law displaces state law. The Founders chose the Supremacy Clause (reinforced by Article III) to perform this function. Although seemingly one-sided, the Clause actually incorporates several important political and procedural safeguards designed to preserve the proper balance between the governance prerogatives of the federal government and the states. It does this …

Making Sense Of Procedural Injury, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This essay uses the Supreme Court’s 2009 opinion describing the version of the harmless error rule courts must use in administrative law cases as a point of entry in attempting to understand the Court’s 1992 opinion recognizing that 'procedural rights are special' for standing purposes. It concludes that courts should apply an easy-to-meet plausibility test in determining whether an agency’s refusal to provide a procedure required by statute or by the constitution has a causal relationship with the challenged agency action sufficient to allow the petitioner to obtain review of the action based on a procedural injury theory. Such a …

The Challenge Of Cooperative Regulatory Relations After Enlargement, Francesca Bignami

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This paper conceptualises European governance as a continuous series of collective action games among national regulators. European administration is theorized as a set of mutually beneficial relations among independent regulators, rather than as a hierarchy of supranational institutions, courts, and national administrators. The collective action approach highlights the importance of certain factors in fostering regulatory cooperation and enabling the common market to become an administrative reality: repeated interactions, monitoring and sanctioning by the Commission and the courts, reciprocity norms, and trust. It also suggests that one of the most significant challenges of enlargement will be to establish cooperative regulatory exchanges …