Law Commons^™

Can Condoms Be Compelling? Examining The State Interest In Confiscating Condoms From Suspected Sex Workers, Meghan Newcomer

Fordham Law Review

Confiscating condoms from suspected sex workers leaves them at risk for HIV/AIDS, other sexually transmitted diseases, and unwanted pregnancy. Yet, police officers in New York, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles collect condoms from sex workers to use against them as evidence of prostitution. Sometimes, the condoms are taken solely for the purpose of harassment. These actions put sex workers at risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases because they may continue to engage in sex work without using protection.

In the landmark case of Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court established a fundamental privacy right in the use and …

Funding Conditions And Free Speech For Hiv/Aids Ngos: He Who Pays The Piper Cannot Always Call The Tune, Alexander P. Wentworth-Ping

Fordham Law Review

The United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act pledges billions of dollars to fund NGOs combating the HIV/AIDS epidemic but requires recipients to adopt a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking. A possible recipient NGO confronts a tough decision: adopt an affirmative statement against prostitution and sex trafficking to accept the funds, alienating a vital partner in its efforts to eradicate HIV/AIDS; or deny the funds to speak its own message, though without the benefit of government assistance.

Courts are split on whether the Leadership Act’s policy requirement places an unconstitutional condition on federal funds that requires …

Aids, Employment, And The Direct Threat Defense: The Burden Of Proof And The Circuit Court Split, Sarah R. Christie

Fordham Law Review

This Note examines disability-related discrimination in light of the protections afforded by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and in the context of an HIV- or AIDS-infected employee. Under the ADA, an employer may legally fire a worker who poses a direct threat to the individuals around him or her. It is unclear, however, whether the burden of proving or disproving the claim that an individual is a direct threat lies with the employer or the employee. This Note analyzes the circuit split over which party bears the burden of proof under the direct threat standard in light of prospective …

Access To Affordable Hiv/Aids Drugs: The Human Rights Obligations Of Multinational Pharmaceutical Corporations , Lissett Ferreira

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Can Hiv-Negative Plaintiffs Recover Emotional Distress Damages For Their Fear Of Aids?, James C. Maroulis

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.