Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Craft Of Legal Writing, Julie M. Cheslik, Wanda M. Temm
The Craft Of Legal Writing, Julie M. Cheslik, Wanda M. Temm
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Can Employment Law Arbitration Work?, Mark Berger
Can Employment Law Arbitration Work?, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
Over the course of the 1960s through early 1990s, a wave of Federal and State legislation modified the presumption of an at-will employment relationship with a number of statutes that gave workers rights to not be terminated for suspect reasons. However, these protections made conflicts following termination of employment far more likely, and measures were taken to try to lessen the chance of these becoming litigation. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation, the use of mandatory alternative dispute resolution, primarily arbitration, to resolve employment rights claims began to be considered. This article examines whether …
Long-Arm Jurisdiction In Kansas, Steve Leben, Mark D. Hinderks
Long-Arm Jurisdiction In Kansas, Steve Leben, Mark D. Hinderks
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Public Opinion, Public Interest Groups, And Political Parties In Creating And Implementing Environmental Policy., Irma S. Russell
The Role Of Public Opinion, Public Interest Groups, And Political Parties In Creating And Implementing Environmental Policy., Irma S. Russell
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Ghetto, Robert L. Hayman, Nancy Levit
The Constitutional Ghetto, Robert L. Hayman, Nancy Levit
Faculty Works
The goal of this Article is to assess two Supreme Court desegregation decisions. It is our view that Board of Education v. Dowell and Freeman v. Pitts are, by almost every measure, seriously flawed decisions. The opinions of the Court rest on epistemic premises - reductionist views of race and racism, and an absurdly formalistic conception of equality - that are by turns either anachronistic, cramped and inauthentic, or demonstrably wrong. Worse, they promote a vision of American society - fragmented, hierarchical, and shamelessly individualistic - that is fundamentally inconsistent both with the egalitarian norms embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment …