Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Faculty Scholarship

Judicial review

1986

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Wrong Questions Get Wrong Answers: An Analysis Of Professor Carter’S Approach To Judicial Review, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1986

Wrong Questions Get Wrong Answers: An Analysis Of Professor Carter’S Approach To Judicial Review, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Comment On Professor Van Alstyne's Paper, Henry P. Monaghan Jan 1986

Comment On Professor Van Alstyne's Paper, Henry P. Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

My major difficulty with Professor Van Alstyne's paper is its incomplete character. In the end, he makes only two points: first, judges are authorized to apply "this Constitution," not to do justice; and second, judges should not lie about what they are doing. The danger is that after a while the first point sounds somewhat empty, while the actual content of the second point seems entirely parasitic on the first.


Distinguishing Justifications From Excuses, Kent Greenawalt Jan 1986

Distinguishing Justifications From Excuses, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

Ann swings her arm and injures Ben. She faces moral condemnation and legal liability unless she can offer an explanation that absolves her of full blame. She might make a claim of justification that, despite initial appearances, her action was desirable or proper, or she might make a claim of excuse that she does not bear full responsibility for injuring Ben. If Ann is fully justified, she will not be subject to blame or to classification as a weak or defective person. If Ann is excused, she may be regarded as wholly or partly free of blame, but she will …