Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Executing Foster V. Neilson: The Two-Step Approach To Analyzing Self-Executing Treaties, David Sloss
Executing Foster V. Neilson: The Two-Step Approach To Analyzing Self-Executing Treaties, David Sloss
Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in Medellin v. Texas unleashed a flood of new scholarship on the doctrine of self-executing treaties. Unfortunately, the entire debate has been founded on two erroneous assumptions. First, courts and commentators have assumed that self-execution is a treaty interpretation question. Second, they have assumed that the modern doctrine of self-execution is essentially the same as the doctrine articulated by Chief Justice Marshall in his seminal opinion in Foster v. Neilson. The consensus view is wrong on both counts.
Properly framed, the self-execution inquiry comprises two distinct questions. First, what does the treaty obligate the United …