Law Commons^™

America’S Preoccupation With Ethics In Government, Vincent R. Johnson

Faculty Articles

Many Americans today expect that the law can, should, and will be used to ensure a level playing field in public life. Americans expect the law to eliminate, insofar as possible, any unfair advantage that might be gained through the use of special connections to those who exercise the power of government. There are numerous rules applicable to judges, lawyers, and public officials that each seek to promote equal treatment for all persons by limiting the ability of persons to use special connections and privileged relationships to gain an advantage in public affairs.

There were two threads of development in …

Representation Elections, Anti-Semitism And The National Labor Relations Board, John W. Teeter Jr, Christopher Burnett

Faculty Articles

The use of anti-Jewish propaganda in labor representation elections undermines employee freedom and workplace democracy. This Judeopathic practice has proved to be a vexing problem for both the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) and the federal courts. The Board has been haphazard and lax in applying the doctrine of Sewell Manufacturing Co. in cases involving anti-Semitism, whereas the federal appellate courts have applied Sewell more consistently to purge elections of anti-Jewish misconduct. This divergence between the Board and reviewing courts may be the result of a pattern of nonacquiescence on the part of the Board. There are four fundamental …

The Ethics Of Communicating With Putative Class Members, Vincent R. Johnson

Faculty Articles

The ethical prohibition against contact with represented persons is an exacting rule. It carries with it the threat of serious consequences, including, but not limited to, attorney discipline, disqualification of counsel, and inadmissibility of evidence obtained in violation of its terms. However, there are still important unresolved questions relating to the interpretation of the rule, including its proper operation in class action litigation.

Following analysis, the various rationales offered in support of the rule fail to justify an application of the contact ban to communications with unnamed putative class members during the pre-certification period of class action litigation. Absent a …

Ethical Campaigning For The Judiciary, Vincent R. Johnson

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

Insurance Contracts And Judicial Discord Over Whether Liability Insurers Must Defend Insureds’ Allegedly Intentional And Immoral Conduct: A Historical And Empirical Review Of Federal And State Courts’ Declaratory Judgments—1900–1997, Willy E. Rice

Faculty Articles

Each year in America, an estimated $200 billion is spent purchasing third-party liability insurance. Fairly recent findings reveal that although some carriers try to settle third-party claims, an unacceptable number of liability companies simply refuse to settle or defend third-party suits. Each year, thousands of consumers and insurers petition state and federal courts for declaratory relief. The simple question asked in these cases is: do liability insurers have a duty to defend policyholders when third-party complainants only allege that insureds committed immoral or intentional acts?

Plaintiffs’ lawyers, defense counsels, state and federal judges, and state legislators and insurance commissioners should …