Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Rhetoric Of Constitutional Law, Erwin Chemerinsky
The Rhetoric Of Constitutional Law, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
I spend much of my time dealing with Supreme Court opinions. Usually, I download and read them the day that they are announced by the Court. I edit them for my casebook and teach them to my students. I write about them, lecture about them, and litigate about them. My focus, like I am sure most everyone's, is functional: I try to discern the holding, appraise the reasoning, ascertain the implications, and evaluate the decision's desirability. Increasingly, though, I have begun to think that this functional approach is overlooking a crucial aspect of Supreme Court decisions: their rhetoric. I use …
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Detentions Without Due Process Of Law Following September 11th, Erwin Chemerinsky
Detentions Without Due Process Of Law Following September 11th, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Washington V. Glucksberg Was Tragically Wrong, Erwin Chemerinsky
Washington V. Glucksberg Was Tragically Wrong, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
Properly focused, there were two questions before the Supreme Court in Washington v. Glucksberg. First, in light of all of the other non-textual rights protected by the Supreme Court under the "liberty" of the Due Process Clause, is the right to assisted death a fundamental right? Second, if so, is the prohibition of assisted death necessary to achieve a compelling interest? Presented in this way, it is clear that the Court erred in Washington v. Glucksberg. The right of a terminally ill person to end his or her life is an essential aspect of autonomy, comparable to aspects of autonomy …