Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

David J Reiss

Selected Works

Mortgages

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac And The Future Of Federal Housing Finance Policy: A Study Of Regulatory Privilege, David J. Reiss Mar 2009

Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac And The Future Of Federal Housing Finance Policy: A Study Of Regulatory Privilege, David J. Reiss

David J Reiss

The federal government recently placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-chartered, privately owned mortgage finance companies, in conservatorship. These two massive companies are profit-driven, but as government-sponsored enterprises they also have a government-mandated mission to provide liquidity and stability to the United States mortgage market and to achieve certain affordable housing goals. How the two companies should exit their conservatorship has implications that reach throughout the global financial markets and are of key importance to the future of American housing finance policy.

While the American taxpayer will be required to fund a bailout of the two companies that will …


The Federal Government’S Implied Guarantee Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac’S Obligations: Uncle Sam Will Pick Up The Tab, David J. Reiss Jan 2008

The Federal Government’S Implied Guarantee Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac’S Obligations: Uncle Sam Will Pick Up The Tab, David J. Reiss

David J Reiss

This article provides the most comprehensive statutory analysis to date of the federal government’s implied guarantee of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s financial obligations. Fannie and Freddie together have $4.45 trillion in mortgage-related obligations. The magnitude of their obligations can only be understood in comparison to the amount of outstanding U.S. government debt -- $5.04 trillion. Given the ongoing meltdown of the residential mortgage market, it is important that the implied guarantee be understood for what it is, a contingent liability of the federal government. After explaining the nature of the implied guarantee and the risks that it poses, the …