Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
“T’Was Three Years After Twombly And All Through The Bar, Not A Plaintiff Was Troubled From Near Or From Far.” The Unremarkable Effect Of The U.S. Supreme Court’S Re-Expressed Pleading Standard In Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly, Daniel R. Karon
Daniel R Karon
No U.S. Supreme Court case in recent memory has caused more confusion and suffering than Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly. Post-Twombly commentary falls largely into two camps: Twombly is wrong because it raised Rule 8’s pleading standard or Twombly is right because it did. But scant, if any, discussion exists suggesting that Twombly is right because it didn’t alter this standard. My Article argues that the Court properly honored longstanding Court precedent when deciding Twombly and merely reaffirmed Rule 8’s pleading requirements. After chronicling the Federal Rules’ creation—with an emphasis on Rule 8—my Article dissects the trilogy of U.S. Supreme …