Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Empirical legal studies (2)
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. (1)
- BIA (1)
- Board of Immigration Appeals (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
-
- Conviction thresholds (1)
- Criminal trials (1)
- DHS (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- EOIR (1)
- Equal educational opportunity (1)
- Essential facilities doctrine (1)
- Executive Office for Immigration Review (1)
- Expulsion decisions (1)
- Expulsion procedures (1)
- Hans Zeisel (1)
- Harry Kalven (1)
- Hung juries (1)
- Immigration litigation (1)
- Immigration surge (1)
- Jr. (1)
- Judge-jury agreement (1)
- Judge-jury disagreement (1)
- Judicial resources (1)
- Juries (1)
- LLP (1)
- NCSC (1)
- National Center for State Courts (1)
- Section 2 of the Sherman Act (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Why Are So Many People Challenging Board Of Immigration Appeals Decisions In Federal Court? An Empirical Analysis Of The Recent Surge In Petitions For Review, John R.B. Palmer, Stephen W. Yale-Loehr, Elizabeth Cronin
Why Are So Many People Challenging Board Of Immigration Appeals Decisions In Federal Court? An Empirical Analysis Of The Recent Surge In Petitions For Review, John R.B. Palmer, Stephen W. Yale-Loehr, Elizabeth Cronin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Judge-Jury Agreement In Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication Of Kalven And Zeisel's The American Jury, Theodore Eisenberg, Paula L. Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, Nicole L. Waters, G. Thomas Munsterman, Stewart J. Schwab, Martin T. Wells
Judge-Jury Agreement In Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication Of Kalven And Zeisel's The American Jury, Theodore Eisenberg, Paula L. Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, Nicole L. Waters, G. Thomas Munsterman, Stewart J. Schwab, Martin T. Wells
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This study uses a new criminal case data set to partially replicate Kalven and Zeisel's classic study of judge-jury agreement. The data show essentially the same rate of judge-jury agreement as did Kalven and Zeisel for cases tried almost 50 years ago. This study also explores judge-jury agreement as a function of evidentiary strength (as reported by both judges and juries), evidentiary complexity (as reported by both judges and juries), legal complexity (as reported by judges), and locale. Regardless of which adjudicator's view of evidentiary strength is used, judges tend to convict more than juries in cases of "middle" evidentiary …
Brown V. Board Of Education, Footnote 11, And Multidisciplinarity, Michael Heise
Brown V. Board Of Education, Footnote 11, And Multidisciplinarity, Michael Heise
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Trinko: Going All The Way, George A. Hay