Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Charles Weisselberg (1)
- Civil trials (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- Garrity v. New Jersey (1)
-
- Juror comprehension (1)
- Juror discussions reform (1)
- Jury decision making (1)
- Jury deliberation (1)
- Jury instructions (1)
- Jury reforms (1)
- Manifestly untrue testimony (1)
- Miranda exclusionary rule (1)
- Miranda rights (1)
- Miranda rules (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Physically impossible testimony (1)
- Police conduct (1)
- Police credibility (1)
- Police testimony (1)
- Public safety exception (1)
- Section 1983 (1)
- Self-contradictory testimony (1)
- Spevack v. Klein (1)
- Suppression hearings (1)
- Testimony contrary to experience (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Are Police Free To Disregard Miranda?, Steven D. Clymer
Are Police Free To Disregard Miranda?, Steven D. Clymer
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Tailored Police Testimony At Suppression Hearings, Joel Atlas
Tailored Police Testimony At Suppression Hearings, Joel Atlas
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Whether a court must suppress evidence typically turns on the conduct or observations of the police officer who discovered the evidence. By falsely testifying to the facts surrounding the discovery of the evidence, a police officer may validate a blatantly unconstitutional search. New York courts have long recognized that police officers sometimes fabricate suppression testimony to meet constitutional restrictions. Indeed, the Appellate Division has rejected police testimony at suppression hearings where the officer’s testimony appears to have been “patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections.” Although, to be sure, rejections are rare and their number appears to be declining, the appellate …
"Speaking Rights": Evaluating Juror Discussions During Civil Trials, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, G. Thomas Munsterman
"Speaking Rights": Evaluating Juror Discussions During Civil Trials, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, G. Thomas Munsterman
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Permitting jurors to discuss evidence during civil trials may facilitate understanding and provide an outlet for their thoughts and questions, and does not appear to lead to prejudgment or prejudice.