Law Commons^™

A Call To Congress To Amend Erisa Preemption Of Hmo Medical Malpractice Claims: The Dissatisfactory Distinction Between Quality And Quantity Of Care, Angela M. Easley

Campbell Law Review

This Comment begins with an overview of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the preemption clause found therein. Section III explains the distinction between quality and quantity of care, the test many courts have relied on to determine whether ERISA preempts a medical malpractice claim. Section IV examines state common law theories of liability which are asserted against managed care organizations, specifically claims of direct and vicarious liability. Section V addresses the HMO's role in medical decision making, and Section VI describes recent legislation regarding ERISA and HMO liability. This Comment contends that the more active role an …