Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Border Wall (1)
- Cooperative Federalism (1)
- Courts (1)
- Doctrinal reasoning (1)
- Eminent Domain (1)
-
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Federal Takings (1)
- Health law (1)
- Home and community-based services (1)
- Homelessness (1)
- Housing First (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial behavior (1)
- Judicial decision making (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and humanities (1)
- Law and literature (1)
- Law and psychology (1)
- Legal decisionmaking (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legal reasoning (1)
- Legalism (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Medicalization (1)
- New legal realism (1)
- Nursing homes (1)
- Performance (1)
- Poverty (1)
- Ritual (1)
- Rule of law (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bundling Justice: Medicaid's Support For Housing, Mary Crossley
Bundling Justice: Medicaid's Support For Housing, Mary Crossley
Articles
Achieving safe and stable housing presents a profound and ongoing challenge for many people living in poverty. The challenges include housing that is substandard or unaffordable and continuing risks of eviction. For a growing number, these challenges prove too much, and they become homeless. In addition, housing-related challenges that are part of daily life for many poor people can influence their physical and mental health. Increased attention to the health impacts of inadequate, insecure, and unaffordable housing has prompted some – including public health experts, physicians, and sociologists studying housing – to urge that housing issues, and homelessness in particular, …
Essay: Cooperative Federalism And Federal Takings After The Trump Administration's Border Wall Executive Order, Gerald S. Dickinson
Essay: Cooperative Federalism And Federal Takings After The Trump Administration's Border Wall Executive Order, Gerald S. Dickinson
Articles
The Trump Administration’s (arguably) most polemic immigration policy — Executive Order No. 13,767 mandating the construction of an international border wall along the southwest border of the United States — offers a timely and instructive opportunity to revisit the elusive question of the federal eminent domain power and the historical practice of cooperative federalism. From federal efforts to restrict admission and entry of foreign nationals and aliens (the so-called “travel ban”) to conditioning federal grants on sanctuary city compliance with federal immigration enforcement, state and local governments (mostly liberal and Democratic enclaves) today have become combative by resisting a federal …
Doctrinal Reasoning As A Disruptive Practice, Jessie Allen
Doctrinal Reasoning As A Disruptive Practice, Jessie Allen
Articles
Legal doctrine is generally thought to contribute to legal decision making only to the extent it determines substantive results. Yet in many cases, the available authorities are indeterminate. I propose a different model for how doctrinal reasoning might contribute to judicial decisions. Drawing on performance theory and psychological studies of readers, I argue that judges’ engagement with formal legal doctrine might have self-disrupting effects like those performers experience when they adopt uncharacteristic behaviors. Such disruptive effects would not explain how judges ultimately select, or should select, legal results. But they might help legal decision makers to set aside subjective biases.