Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Congress (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Code of Military Justice (1)
- Commandeering (1)
-
- Confessions (1)
- Cowardice (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Discipline (1)
- Due process (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fear (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Gregory v. Ashcroft (1)
- History (1)
- Individuals (1)
- Interstate commerce (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Liberty (1)
- Military conduct (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- New York v. United States (1)
- Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Printz v. United States (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (1)
- Sovereign immunity (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Weak Legs: Misbehavior Before The Enemy, William I. Miller
Weak Legs: Misbehavior Before The Enemy, William I. Miller
Articles
Making cowardice a capital offense strikes us as a kind of barbaric survival from a rougher age, a time, that is, when few doubted that courage ranked higher than pity or prudence in the scale of virtues. And if many of us today believe that capital punishment cannot be justified even for the sadistic torturer, what a shock to discover that, as an official matter at least, Congress reserves it for the person who cannot kill at all.
"Can (Did) Congress 'Overrule' Miranda?, Yale Kamisar
"Can (Did) Congress 'Overrule' Miranda?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I think the great majority of judges, lawyers, and law professors would have concurred in Judge Friendly's remarks when he made them thirty-three years ago. To put it another way, I believe few would have had much confidence in the constitutionality of an anti-Miranda provision, usually known as § 3501 because of its designation under Title 18 of the United States Code, a provision of Title II of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Crime Act or the Crime Bill), when that legislation was signed by the president on June 19, …
Constitutional Federalism, Individual Liberty, And The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998, Adam C. Pritchard
Constitutional Federalism, Individual Liberty, And The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
This Article proceeds in four parts. Part I provides background on the historical development of constitutional federalism, the Supreme Court's decisions in this area, and the apparent demise of constitutional limits on federal power. Part II then reviews the Court's revival of constitutional federalism over the last decade. Based on this review, I argue that the Supreme Court's current federalism doctrine can be understood as a "constrained libertarianism" that attempts to use constitutional structure as a check on government interference with individual liberty. In this model, states are respected in our constitutional system because of the counterbalance that they provide …