Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Defamation (2)
- Campaign funds (1)
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (1)
- Communications Decency Act (1)
- Elections (1)
-
- Expression of opinion (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Gertz v. Robert Welch (1)
- Intermediary liability (1)
- Internet law (1)
- Libel per quod (1)
- Libel per se (1)
- Media law (1)
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal (1)
- Other General Government Support (1)
- Political advertising (1)
- Regulation and Administration of Communications (1)
- Section 230 (1)
- Speech torts (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Collateral Censorship And The Limits Of Intermediary Immunity, Felix T. Wu
Collateral Censorship And The Limits Of Intermediary Immunity, Felix T. Wu
Articles
The law often limits the liability of an intermediary for the speech it carries. And rightly so, because imposing liability on intermediaries can induce them to filter out questionable content and this “collateral censorship” risks suppressing much lawful, even highly beneficial, speech. The “collateral censorship” rationale has its limits, though, and correspondingly, so should the applicability of intermediary immunity. The worry with collateral censorship is not just that intermediaries censor, but that they censor more than an original speaker would in the face of potential liability. Increased censorship, in turn, is the product of applying liability targeted at original speakers …
Plan B For Campaign-Finance Reform: Can The Fcc Help Save American Politics After Citizens United?, Lili Levi
Plan B For Campaign-Finance Reform: Can The Fcc Help Save American Politics After Citizens United?, Lili Levi
Articles
No abstract provided.
When Machines Are Watching: How Warrantless Use Of Gps Surveillance Technology Violates The Fourth Amendment Right Against Unreasonable Searches, David Thaw, Priscilla Smith, Nabiha Syed, Albert Wong
When Machines Are Watching: How Warrantless Use Of Gps Surveillance Technology Violates The Fourth Amendment Right Against Unreasonable Searches, David Thaw, Priscilla Smith, Nabiha Syed, Albert Wong
Articles
Federal and state law enforcement officials throughout the nation are currently using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology for automated, prolonged surveillance without obtaining warrants. As a result, cases are proliferating in which criminal defendants are challenging law enforcement’s warrantless uses of GPS surveillance technology, and courts are looking for direction from the Supreme Court. Most recently, a split has emerged between the Ninth and D.C. Circuit Courts of Appeal on the issue. In United States v. Pineda-Moreno, the Ninth Circuit relied on United States v. Knotts — which approved the limited use of beeper technology without a warrant — to …
Opinions, Implications, And Confusions, Leonard M. Niehoff
Opinions, Implications, And Confusions, Leonard M. Niehoff
Articles
The law of defamation is haunted by ancient common law principles, such as the distinction between libel per se and libel per quad, that contribute nothing to our current jurisprudence beyond providing opportunities for misunderstanding and perplexity. Unfortunately, more contemporary doctrines have further complicated the field by sowing fresh confusions. This article explores two such doctrines-the principle that a defamation claim cannot rest upon an opinion and the principle that a defamation claim can rest upon unstated implications- and suggests that there are troublesome contradictions both within them and between them. In short, this article respectfully proposes that these two …