Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Eighth Circuit Court (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- And Sanctions (BDS) Movement (1)
- Antidiscrimination laws (1)
-
- Arkansas Court of Appeals (1)
- Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Associational rights (1)
- Boycott (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Divestment (1)
- Federal powers (1)
- Federal regulation (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (1)
- Israel (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Materialmen's-lien statutes (1)
- Mechanics'-lien statutes (1)
- Original intent (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Section 1983 (1)
- State's powers (1)
- Students' rights (1)
- University of Arkansas (1)
- University regulations (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Recent Developments, Silas Heffley
Recent Developments, Silas Heffley
Arkansas Law Review
In a case involving a Missouri televangelist, a purported COVID-19 cure, and state officials from Arkansas and California, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The Problem Of Qualified Immunity In K-12 Schools, Sarah Smith
The Problem Of Qualified Immunity In K-12 Schools, Sarah Smith
Arkansas Law Review
When thirteen-year-old Savana Redding arrived at school one autumn day in 2003, she was not expecting to be pulled out of her math class and strip searched. But, that is exactly what happened after the assistant principal suspected her of possessing and distributing “prescription-strength ibuprofen” and “over-the-counter. . .naproxen” after receiving information from another student. After Savana consented to a search of her backpack and other belongings—a search which turned up no evidence of drug possession—the assistant principal asked the school nurse and administrative assistant to search Savana’s clothes. To do this, the school officials asked Savana “to remove her …
Reassociating Student Rights: Giving It The Ole College Try, Tyler Mlakar
Reassociating Student Rights: Giving It The Ole College Try, Tyler Mlakar
Arkansas Law Review
At the beginning of 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared Coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) a “public health emergency of international concern.” Governments around the world began instituting citywide and even nationwide “lockdowns.” In the United States, the approach was far more splintered. While there was no nationwide lockdown, states across the country instituted varying measures ranging from “shelter-in-place” and “stay at home” orders, to school closures, limits on the size of public gatherings, “mask mandates,” and even some states allowing restaurants and bars to remain open. Across the United States, these measures have resulted in the most pervasive governmental …
Slavery And The History Of Congress's Enumerated Powers, Jeffrey Schmitt
Slavery And The History Of Congress's Enumerated Powers, Jeffrey Schmitt
Arkansas Law Review
In his first inaugural address, President Abraham Lincoln declared, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” Like virtually all Americans before the Civil War, Lincoln believed in what historians call the “national consensus” on slavery. According to this consensus, Congress’s enumerated powers were not broad enough to justify any regulation of slavery within the states. Legal scholars who support the modern reach of federal powers have thus conventionally argued …
Why Arkansas Act 710 Was Upheld, And Will Be Again, Mark Goldfeder
Why Arkansas Act 710 Was Upheld, And Will Be Again, Mark Goldfeder
Arkansas Law Review
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. - ironically, not Mark Twain The recent Eighth Circuit ruling in Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip, the lawsuit revolving around an Arkansas antidiscrimination bill, has led to a lot of (at best) confusion or (at worst) purposeful obfuscation by people unwilling or unable to differentiate between procedural issues and the constitutional merits of a case. In other words, reports of the bill’s death have been very much exaggerated.