Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Patent (5)
- Corrosion (4)
- F: Foreign Patents (4)
- Lactate (3)
- A: Published Law Review Articles (1)
-
- Adjudicate (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Arizona Juvenile Law (1)
- B: Unpublished Papers (1)
- C: Presentations (1)
- Claims (1)
- Continuation (1)
- Delinquency (1)
- Dependency (1)
- Foreign (1)
- Inhibitor (1)
- Juvenile (1)
- Korea (1)
- Lithography (1)
- Novelty (1)
- Obviousness (1)
- Patent office (1)
- Patent prosecution (1)
- Patent rules (1)
- Photoresist (1)
- Severance (1)
- Taiwan (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Chinese Patent No. Cn100474520c, Adam R. Stephenson
Chinese Patent No. Cn100474520c, Adam R. Stephenson
Adam Stephenson
No abstract provided.
Uk Patent No. Gb2431278b, Adam R. Stephenson
Arizona Juvenile Law Legal Research: Resources And Strategies, Adam R. Stephenson
Arizona Juvenile Law Legal Research: Resources And Strategies, Adam R. Stephenson
Adam Stephenson
This article aims to provide a practical resource not currently available to juvenile attorneys helping Arizona’s children and youth find permanency and support as they grow to adulthood. This article provides a comprehensive review of the history of Arizona juvenile law and available Arizona legal resources along with their usefulness and accessibility for the Arizona juvenile legal practitioner. It also provides assessments of the cost, best applications, overall utility and locations of the various resources around the state. The appendices include outlines of the Arizona case law regarding both delinquent and dependent juveniles.
Korean Patent No. Kr1020067027478, Adam R. Stephenson
Korean Patent No. Kr1020067027478, Adam R. Stephenson
Adam Stephenson
No abstract provided.
A View Of The Future In Semiconductor Process: Patent Prosecution In Class 438 Under The United States Patent And Trademark Office’S Final Claims And Continuations Rules, Adam R. Stephenson
A View Of The Future In Semiconductor Process: Patent Prosecution In Class 438 Under The United States Patent And Trademark Office’S Final Claims And Continuations Rules, Adam R. Stephenson
Adam Stephenson
While the US patent prosecution process appears carefully defined and heavily regulated, a statistical review of 530 randomly selected issued patents and published patent applications from class 438 (semiconductor process) over a six year period indicates that since the system is run by people, ordinary negotiating norms significantly explain the outcomes observed. The results are driven by interests created within patent examiners by the performance management metrics and systems in place within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). The data indicates that practitioners willing to spend the time to prepare by understanding the average examiner’s interests and to …
Post Ksr V. Teleflex: Is Anything Invented Patentable Anymore?, Adam R. Stephenson
Post Ksr V. Teleflex: Is Anything Invented Patentable Anymore?, Adam R. Stephenson
Adam Stephenson
The Supreme Court's 2007 KSR v. Teleflex decision greatly broaded the definition of "obviousness" under 35 U.S.C. 103. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's expansively interpreted the case to overturn a number of key Federal Circuit cases relied heavily upon by patent practitioners. In view of the USPTO's position, can any invention be patented?
Taiwan Patent No. Tw270143b, Adam R. Stephenson