Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- All Writs Act (1)
- Assumption of Risk Doctrine (1)
- Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (1)
- Class Action Lawsuits (1)
- Contributory Negligence (1)
-
- Federalism (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Health Screening (1)
- Injunctions (1)
- Insurance Policies (1)
- Judicial Process (1)
- Mass Tort Suits (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Personal Jurisdiction (1)
- Product Liability (1)
- Republican Party (United States) (1)
- Settlements (1)
- State Courts (1)
- State Rights (1)
- Subject Matter Jurisdiction (1)
- Tort Reform (1)
- Torts (1)
- United States Constitution. 10th Amendment (1)
- United States. Supreme Court (1)
- W&M Faculty (1)
- William H. Rehnquist-- Criticism and Interpretation (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Curious Complications With Back-End Opt-Out Rights, Rhonda Wasserman
The Curious Complications With Back-End Opt-Out Rights, Rhonda Wasserman
William & Mary Law Review
In recent years, class members have been afforded delayed, or "back-end," opportunities to opt out of a class action once the terms of the settlement are disclosed. These back-end opt-out rights may afford only limited rights to sue outside the confines of the class action. For example, opt-out plaintiffs may be permitted to seek compensatory, but not punitive damages. Does the federal court that approved the settlement have authority to enjoin back-end opt-out plaintiffs from seeking relief in state court that exceeds the limits built into the back-end opt-out right?
Three sets of curious complications may arise if the federal …
Introductory Remarks: Explaining Tort Law, Michael S. Green
Introductory Remarks: Explaining Tort Law, Michael S. Green
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Derailing The Gravy Train: A Three Pronged Approach To End Fraud In Mass-Tort Medical Diagnosing, Matthew Mall
Derailing The Gravy Train: A Three Pronged Approach To End Fraud In Mass-Tort Medical Diagnosing, Matthew Mall
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sleight Of Hand, Benjamin C. Zipursky
A Products Liability Theory For The Judicial Regulation Of Insurance Policies, Daniel Schwarcz
A Products Liability Theory For The Judicial Regulation Of Insurance Policies, Daniel Schwarcz
William & Mary Law Review
Many insurance law commentators believe that judges should regulate the substance of insurance policies by refusing to enforce insurance policy terms that are exploitive or otherwise unfair. The most common guide for the judicial regulation of insurance policies is the "reasonable expectations doctrine," which requires courts to disregard coverage restrictions that are beyond insureds' reasonable expectations unless the insurer specifically informed the insured about the restriction at the time of purchase. This Article argues that although the judiciary has a potential role to play in policing insurance policy terms, that role should not be defined by reference to consumers' reasonable …
Anti-Federalist Procedure, A. Benjamin Spencer
Anti-Federalist Procedure, A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
"[T]he new federal government will ... be disinclined to invade the rights of the individual States, or the prerogatives of their governments."
"[T]he Constitution of the United States ... recognizes and preserves the autonomy and independence of the States-independence in their legislative and independence in their judicial departments. . . . Any interference with either, except as [constitutionally] permitted, is an invasion of the authority of the State and, to that extent, a denial of its independence."
The understanding expressed by these opening quotes-that the national government was designed to be one of limited powers that would refrain from encroaching …
Judging Plaintiffs, Jason M. Solomon
Judging Plaintiffs, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the law of torts, corrective justice is considered the leading moral theory of tort law. It has a significant advantage over instrumental and other moral theories in that it is more consistent with what judges say when they analyze tort law concepts. And with criticism of instrumental accounts, like law and economics, on a number of fronts, it is the leading descriptive theory of tort law. In this Article, I take up a question that has never been answered adequately by corrective-justice or other moral …