Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Will, Judgment, And Economic Liberty: Mr. Justice Souter And The Mistranslation Of The Due Process Clause, Alan J. Meese
Will, Judgment, And Economic Liberty: Mr. Justice Souter And The Mistranslation Of The Due Process Clause, Alan J. Meese
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lochner, Parity, And The Chinese Laundry Cases, David E. Bernstein
Lochner, Parity, And The Chinese Laundry Cases, David E. Bernstein
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fiscal Powers And The 1930s: Entrenchment, John Harrison
The Fiscal Powers And The 1930s: Entrenchment, John Harrison
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Inevitable Infidelities Of Constitutional Translation: The Case Of The New Deal, John O. Mcginnis
The Inevitable Infidelities Of Constitutional Translation: The Case Of The New Deal, John O. Mcginnis
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fragmented Liberty Clause, Rebecca L. Brown
The Fragmented Liberty Clause, Rebecca L. Brown
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lost Fidelities, Barry Cushman
Introduction: Fidelity, Economic Liberty, And 1937, Editors Of The William And Mary Law Review
Introduction: Fidelity, Economic Liberty, And 1937, Editors Of The William And Mary Law Review
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Continuing The Trend Toward Equality: The Eradication Of Racially And Sexually Discriminatory Provisions In Private Trusts, Katheryn F. Voyer
Continuing The Trend Toward Equality: The Eradication Of Racially And Sexually Discriminatory Provisions In Private Trusts, Katheryn F. Voyer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Racially and sexually discriminatory private trusts are presumed to be valid under traditional common law governing dispositions of property. Most courts have held that if the state plays a "passive" role, only private actors are involved and the Fourteenth Amendment is not implicated The United States Supreme Court, however, has declared in one context that discriminatory charitable trusts violate public policy and are unconstitutional. This Note argues that because private trusts involve unlawful state action and are not purely private, courts have an affirmative obligation imposed by the Supreme Court and a moral responsibility because of well-established public policy against …