Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Sales, John D. Wladis, Larry T. Garvin, Martin A. Kotler, Robyn L. Meadows Jan 2001

Sales, John D. Wladis, Larry T. Garvin, Martin A. Kotler, Robyn L. Meadows

John D Wladis

No abstract provided.


The Contract Formation Sections Of The Proposed Revisions To Ucc Article 2, John D. Wladis Jan 2001

The Contract Formation Sections Of The Proposed Revisions To Ucc Article 2, John D. Wladis

John D Wladis

No abstract provided.


Sales, John D. Wladis, Larry T. Garvin, Robyn L. Meadows, Veryl L. Miles, Mark E. Roszkowski Aug 2000

Sales, John D. Wladis, Larry T. Garvin, Robyn L. Meadows, Veryl L. Miles, Mark E. Roszkowski

John D Wladis

No abstract provided.


Sales, John D. Wladis, Thomas J. Mccarthy, Patricia A. Tauchert, Mark A. Roszkowski Jan 1998

Sales, John D. Wladis, Thomas J. Mccarthy, Patricia A. Tauchert, Mark A. Roszkowski

John D Wladis

No abstract provided.


Common Law And Uncommon Events: The Development Of The Doctrine Of Impossibility Of Performance In English Contract Law, John D. Wladis Jan 1987

Common Law And Uncommon Events: The Development Of The Doctrine Of Impossibility Of Performance In English Contract Law, John D. Wladis

John D Wladis

No abstract provided.


Uniform Commercial Code Annual Survey: General Provisions, Sales, Bulk Transfers, And Documents Of Title, David Frisch, Fairfax Leary, John D. Wladis Jan 1986

Uniform Commercial Code Annual Survey: General Provisions, Sales, Bulk Transfers, And Documents Of Title, David Frisch, Fairfax Leary, John D. Wladis

John D Wladis

No abstract provided.


U.C.C. Article 3 Suretyship And The Holder In Due Course: Requiem For The Good Samaritan,, John D. Wladis Jan 1982

U.C.C. Article 3 Suretyship And The Holder In Due Course: Requiem For The Good Samaritan,, John D. Wladis

John D Wladis

Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code accords valuable privileges both to the holder in due course and to the surety who signs his principal's note. When the holder in due course sues the surety on the note, however, a conflict inevitably arises between these two typically innocent parties. The conflict is most acute when the surety attempts to assert a real defense of his principal against the holder in due course. In this article, Professor Wladis explores the reasons for favoring one party or the other in the context of various real defenses. The balance of policy considerations, according …