Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Vanderbilt University Law School

Vanderbilt Law Review

Journal

1954

Federal practice

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Book Reviews, Walter P. Armstrong Jr., Robert A. Pascal Jun 1954

Book Reviews, Walter P. Armstrong Jr., Robert A. Pascal

Vanderbilt Law Review

Bender's Federal Practice Forms By Louis R. Frumer Albany: Matthew Bender & Company, 1951-53, 4 Vols.(1 to follow), $85.00

reviewer: Walter P. Armstrong, Jr.

=============================================

Principles of Agency By Merton Ferson Brooklyn: The FoundationPress, 1954. Pp. xx, 490

reviewer: Robert A. Pascal


The Elimination Of Surprise In Federal Practice, Alexander Holtzoff Jun 1954

The Elimination Of Surprise In Federal Practice, Alexander Holtzoff

Vanderbilt Law Review

There are occasions when in the interest of clarity of thought it behooves us to get back to first principles. When brought back to mind, these principles appear simple and obvious, but so much of our life's work is devoted to details that the tendency is for the trees to obscure the view of the forest, unless we stop at intervals and refresh ourselves by recalling fundamentals.

The courts exist for the purpose of administering justice. The objective of a law suit is to determine a controversy between man and man by ascertaining the facts, finding the governing principles of …


Twenty-Nine Distinct Damnations Of The Federal Practice -- And A National Ministry Of Justice, Arthur J. Keeffe Jun 1954

Twenty-Nine Distinct Damnations Of The Federal Practice -- And A National Ministry Of Justice, Arthur J. Keeffe

Vanderbilt Law Review

There are certain fundamental truths. Neither the practicing lawyer nor the best judge has the requisite time to worry about the "why" of a rule of law. And this is true whether the point be one of substantive or adjective law although, as we know, the two are inter-mixed and one.

If the day's work be done, the bar and the judiciary must take the law as they find it, right or wrong, sensible or nonsensical, and do the best they can. Theirs is not to reason why.

I do not mean to deny that now and then a court …