Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Administrative courts (1)
- Article III (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Countermajoritarian difficulty (1)
-
- Criminal law (1)
- Dissenting opinions (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Injury (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Justice (1)
- Justice reform (1)
- Public and private enforcement (1)
- Russian Constitutional Court (1)
- Soft power (1)
- Special Solicitude (1)
- Standing (1)
- State courts (1)
- States (1)
- Technology in the courtroom (1)
- The role of courts (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standing For Nothing, Robert Mikos
Standing For Nothing, Robert Mikos
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
A growing number of courts and commentators have suggested that states have Article III standing to protect state law. Proponents of such "protective" standing argue that states must be given access to federal court whenever their laws are threatened. Absent such access, they claim, many state laws might prove toothless, thereby undermining the value of the states in our federal system. Furthermore, proponents insist that this form of special solicitude is very limited-that it opens the doors to the federal courthouses a crack but does not swing them wide open. This Essay, however, contests both of these claims, and thus, …
Private Enforcement In Administrative Courts, Michael Sant'ambrogio
Private Enforcement In Administrative Courts, Michael Sant'ambrogio
Vanderbilt Law Review
Scholars debating the relative merits of public and private enforcement have long trained their attention on the federal courts. For some, laws giving private litigants rights to vindicate important policies generate unaccountable private attorneys general" who interfere with public enforcement goals. For others, private lawsuits save cash-strapped government lawyers money, time, and resources by encouraging private parties to police misconduct on their own. Yet largely overlooked in the debate is enforcement inside agency adjudication, which often is depicted as just another form of public enforcement, only in a friendlier forum.
This Article challenges the prevailing conception of administrative enforcement. Based …
The Soft Power Of Dissent: The Impact Of Dissenting Opinions From The Russian Constitutional Court, Alexandra V. Orlova
The Soft Power Of Dissent: The Impact Of Dissenting Opinions From The Russian Constitutional Court, Alexandra V. Orlova
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article poses a question regarding the importance of judicial dissents emanating from constitutional courts. It examines the power of dissents emanating from the Russian Constitutional Court, given the fact that the Russian government has invested a significant effort in suppressing dissenting voices. The very presence of dissents in the Russian Constitutional Court poses an interesting question regarding their impact on democracy, consensus building, and civil society. This Article argues that while dissents coming from the Russian Constitutional Court may not be binding, they carry a great deal of "soft power." Judicial dissents aid in challenging commonly espoused consensus both …
The States Have Spoken: Allow Expanded Media Coverage Of The Federal Courts, Mitchell T. Galloway
The States Have Spoken: Allow Expanded Media Coverage Of The Federal Courts, Mitchell T. Galloway
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Since the advent of film and video recording, society has enjoyed the ability to capture the lights and sounds of moments in history. This innovation left courts to determine what place, if any, such technology should have inside the courtroom. Refusing to constrain the future capacity of this technology, the Supreme Court "punted" on this issue until a time when this technology evolved past its initial disruptive nature. Throughout the past forty-five years, the vast majority of state courts have embraced the potential of cameras in the courtroom and have created policies governing such use. In contrast, the federal judiciary …
Beyond Samuel Moyn's Countermajoritarian Difficulty As A Model Of Global Judicial Review, James T. Gathii
Beyond Samuel Moyn's Countermajoritarian Difficulty As A Model Of Global Judicial Review, James T. Gathii
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article responds to Samuel Moyn's critique of judicial review and his endorsement of judicial modesty as an alternative. By invoking the countermajoritarian difficulty, Moyn argues that judicial overreach has become an unwelcome global phenomenon that should be reexamined and curbed. I reject Moyn's claim that this kind of judicial modesty should define the role of courts for all time. By applying the countermajoritarian difficulty beyond its United States origins, Moyn assumes it is an unproblematic baseline against which to measure the role of courts globally. Moyn's vision says nothing about when it would be appropriate for courts to rule …
Integrating The Access To Justice Movement, Lauren Sudeall
Integrating The Access To Justice Movement, Lauren Sudeall
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Last fall, advocates of social change came together at the A2J Summit at Fordham University School of Law and discussed how to galvanize a national access to justice movement - who would it include, and what would or should it attempt to achieve? One important preliminary question we tackled was how such a movement would define "justice," and whether it would apply only to the civil justice system. Although the phrase "access to justice" is not exclusively civil in nature, more often than not it is taken to have that connotation. Lost in the interpretation is an opportunity to engage …