Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Washington School of Law

1996

Intellectual Property Law

Washington Law Review

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Attorney-Client Privilege Versus The Pto's Duty Of Candor: Resolving The Clash In Simultaneous Patent Representations, Todd M. Becker Oct 1996

Attorney-Client Privilege Versus The Pto's Duty Of Candor: Resolving The Clash In Simultaneous Patent Representations, Todd M. Becker

Washington Law Review

Patent attorneys play dual roles: they are simultaneously attorneys and patent practitioners. Their dual role causes problems when the rules that govern one role conflict with the rules that govern the other. One such problem is illustrated in Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc., where a patent attorney simultaneously representing two clients was caught between the Patent & Trademark Office's duty of candor and the attorney's duty of confidentiality imposed by the rules of professional responsibility. The Molins decision presents a problem because it creates uncertainty about whether confidentiality can be maintained by using the attorney-client privilege to defeat the …


Phonorecords And Forfeiture Of Common-Law Copyright In Music, Mark A. Bailey Jan 1996

Phonorecords And Forfeiture Of Common-Law Copyright In Music, Mark A. Bailey

Washington Law Review

A highly disputed issue surrounding the Copyright Act of 1909 is whether the public distribution and sale of recordings of a musical work constitutes "publication." Historically, unless the author followed the Act's formal requirements for obtaining statutory protection, publication injected the musical work irrevocably into the public domain. In a 1995 decision, La Cienega Music Co. v. ZZ Top, the Ninth Circuit unwisely broke from the tradition and common understanding in the music industry by holding that phonorecord distribution is a publication of musical compositions. After examining the history and purpose of the Copyright Act, as well as the …


Can Reverse Engineering Of Software Ever Be Fair Use? Application Of Cambell'S "Transformative Use" Concept, John A. Williams Jan 1996

Can Reverse Engineering Of Software Ever Be Fair Use? Application Of Cambell'S "Transformative Use" Concept, John A. Williams

Washington Law Review

Several years after Atari v. Nintendo and Sega v. Accolade, debate and confusion remain within the U.S. software industry and legal community concerning the appropriate application of copyright's fair use doctrine to reverse engineering of software. This Comment discusses why and how the U.S. Supreme Court's recent fair use analysis in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music should be applied to help resolve the reverse engineering issue. Not only would application of Campbell's approach promote consistency among courts and confidence within the software industry, but it also would safeguard copyright's ultimate objective: the advancement of society's growth in science and …


Copyright Protection For Architectural Design: A Conceptual And Practical Criticism, Gregory B. Hancks Jan 1996

Copyright Protection For Architectural Design: A Conceptual And Practical Criticism, Gregory B. Hancks

Washington Law Review

The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990 (AWCPA) extended copyright protection to architectural design as part of Congress's effort to conform U.S. law to the Berne Convention. U.S. courts previously had treated architecture as a "useful article" and generally had denied it protection under the "separability" doctrine. The AWCPA treats architecture similarly to other categories of copyrightable subject matter. Conceptually, this is inappropriate because (I) architectural design is a professional service, (2) architecture is a part of our public environment, and (3) architecture's expressive aspects cannot be adequately separated from its useful aspects. As a practical matter, the AWCPA …