Law Commons^™

And Then There Were Two: Splitting South Carolina's Department Of Health And Environmental Control, Arslan S. Valimohamed

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Making Executioners Out Of Pharmacists: Why South Carolina Should Not Adopt A Lethal Injection Secrecy Statute, Elizabeth T. French

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Antiquated Relics Or Misunderstood Mess, Why South Carolina Liquor Laws Are Ripe For Restructuring, Annie Day Bame

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Don't Feel Like Going To The Store, I'Ll Drink To That, How To Govern The Direct Shipment Of Alcohol In South Carolina, Frederick N. Hanna

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Does Sex Discrimination Include Gender Identity, Courts In The Fourth Circuit Weigh In On The Question, Rena M. Lindevaldsen

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Centralized Review Of Tax Regulations, Clinton G. Wallace

Faculty Publications

Centralized oversight of agency policymaking and spending by the President’s Office of Management and Budget is a hallmark of the modern administrative state. But tax regulations have almost never been subject to centralized review. The Trump administration recently proposed to require centralized review of tax regulations, but it is unclear what regulations would be subject to such review or how it would be conducted.

This Article examines the normative desirability of the longstanding approach of exempting tax regulations from centralized review, and the alternative of imposing such review. Scholars and policymakers have provided various incomplete justifications for excepting tax policy …

Congressional Control Of Tax Rulemaking, Clint Wallace

Faculty Publications

The notice and comment process is often touted as a mechanism for establishing political accountability, and providing a check on agency decision-making. Based on a survey of three years of recently proposed tax regulations, this Article shows that many notice-and-comment processes for tax regulations have been ineffective for these purposes. Fully one-third of the time, no one participated. The few participants there are have been heavily weighted towards private interests, which commented on approximately two-thirds of all proposed regulations from 2013 through 2015. In contrast, public interest groups commented on less than 24% of proposed regulations. If the notice and …

Do Sagebrush Rebels Have A Colorable Claim? The Space Between Parochialism And Exclusion In Federal Lands Management, Ann M. Eisenberg

Faculty Publications

This Article asks whether the troubling nature of the Sagebrush Rebellion and similar movements (e.g., their violence, antienvironmentalism, and racist overtones) has made us overly dismissive of a kernel of truth in their complaints. Commentators often acknowledge that federal lands management may be “unfair” to local communities, but the ethical and legal characteristics of the unfairness concern remain under-explored. Although the Sagebrush Rebellion and federal lands communities are far from synonymous, substantial overlap between the complaints and demands of Sagebrush Rebels and the complaints and demands of many regional local (and state) governments suggests that to explore the one necessitates …

Changes In Administrative Agency And Legal Practice In South Carolina Following State V. Peake, Jared Q. Libet

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ogburn-Matthews V. Loblolly Partners: Procedural Due Process And An Individual's Right To An Adjudicatory Hearing, Pamela A. Baker

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law, W. Dixon Roberts Iii

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.