Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Gender and Sexuality (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
-
- Sociology (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Anthropology (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Inequality and Stratification (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Medical Specialties (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Nonprofit Administration and Management (1)
- Nonprofit Organizations Law (1)
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Americans for Prosperity (1)
- Amicus (1)
- Attorney General (1)
- Charitable (1)
-
- Charitable contribution (1)
- Charity (1)
- City of Boerne (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Conflicts of law (1)
- Congress (1)
- Congruence and proportionality (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Disability (1)
- Dobbs (1)
- Donor Disclosure (1)
- EMTALA (1)
- Emergency medicine (1)
- Enforcement clause power (1)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Hate crimes (1)
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1)
- Maternal health (1)
- Miscarriage (1)
- Moyle (1)
- Nonprofit (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Private action (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Rationality standard (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief Of Amici Curiae In Support Of The United States: Moyle & Idaho V. United States, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Brief Of Amici Curiae In Support Of The United States: Moyle & Idaho V. United States, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Amici Briefs
This amicus brief, submitted to the Supreme Court in Moyle v. United States, argues that Moyle, and the impending circuit split surrounding it, is a symptom of a larger workability problem with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization framework. Dobbs is already proving, in its brief existence, to be unworkable, and must be overturned. In short order, the Dobbs ruling has ushered in an era of unprecedented legal and doctrinal chaos, precipitating a fury of disorienting legal battles across the country. The Dobbs framework has created destabilizing conflicts between federal and state authorities, as in the current …
Brief Of Amici Curiae Scholars Of The Law Of Non-Profit Organizations In Support Of Respondent: Americans For Prosperity Foundation V. Matthew Rodriguez, Nos. 19-251 & 19-255, Ellen P. Aprill, Roger Colinvaux, Sean Delany, James Fishman, Brian D. Galle, Philip Hackney, Jill R. Horwitz, Cindy Lott, Ray D. Madoff, Jill S. Manny, Nancy A. Mclaughlin, Richard Schmalbeck
Brief Of Amici Curiae Scholars Of The Law Of Non-Profit Organizations In Support Of Respondent: Americans For Prosperity Foundation V. Matthew Rodriguez, Nos. 19-251 & 19-255, Ellen P. Aprill, Roger Colinvaux, Sean Delany, James Fishman, Brian D. Galle, Philip Hackney, Jill R. Horwitz, Cindy Lott, Ray D. Madoff, Jill S. Manny, Nancy A. Mclaughlin, Richard Schmalbeck
Amici Briefs
The twelve individuals filing this amicus brief are professors and scholars of the law of nonprofit organizations. No party in this case represents all three of charity’s key stakeholders: charities, states, and taxpayers who underwrite the charities’ funding. Amici are participating in this litigation in order to aid the Court in understanding how these three interests depend on one another. They also attempt to provide a clearer understanding of state supervision of charities and how that supervision related to federal tax law.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Thirteenth Amendment Scholars In Support Of Plaintiff-Appellee And Affirmance, William M. Carter Jr., Dawinder S. Sidhu, Alexander Tsesis, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Brief Of Amici Curiae Thirteenth Amendment Scholars In Support Of Plaintiff-Appellee And Affirmance, William M. Carter Jr., Dawinder S. Sidhu, Alexander Tsesis, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Amici Briefs
In the case of United States v. Hatch, the defendant in a hate crimes prosecution brought the first major challenge to the constitutionality of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. This amicus brief argues that the Act is constitutional under the Thirteenth Amendment.