Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Arbitration (1)
- Article III (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Ethnic (1)
-
- Foreign judgments (1)
- Global warming (1)
- Hard look review (1)
- Inaction (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Kosovo (1)
- Legal pluralism (1)
- Massachusetts v. EPA (1)
- Post-conflict (1)
- Post-conflict justice (1)
- Recognition (1)
- Recognition of judgments (1)
- Religious (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- State standing (1)
- Transitional justice (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Parallel Courts In Post-Conflict Kosovo, Elena Baylis
Parallel Courts In Post-Conflict Kosovo, Elena Baylis
Articles
Even as American attention is focused on Iraq's struggle to rebuild its political and legal systems in the face of violent sectarian divisions, another fractured society - Kosovo - has begun negotiations to resolve the question of its political independence. Kosovo's efforts to establish multi-ethnic rule of law in the context of persistent ethnic divisions offer lessons in transitional justice and in managing legal pluralism for Iraq and other states.
In Kosovo today, two parallel judicial systems each claim sole jurisdiction over the province. One system was established by the United Nations administration in Kosovo, while the other system is …
Massachusetts V. Epa: Breaking New Ground On Issues Other Than Global Warming, Amy J. Wildermuth, Kathryn A. Watts
Massachusetts V. Epa: Breaking New Ground On Issues Other Than Global Warming, Amy J. Wildermuth, Kathryn A. Watts
Articles
In this essay, we consider the long-term legal significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, concluding that the case is likely to have a significant impact on two doctrinal areas of the law: (1) the standing of states; and (2) the standard of review applied to denials of petitions for rulemaking. First, although we have some questions about the Court's reasoning, we are encouraged to see the beginning of a framework for evaluating state standing based on the interest of the state in the litigation. Second, with respect to judicial review of agency inaction in the rulemaking …