Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communication (1)
- Communication Technology and New Media (1)
- Computer Engineering (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Digital Communications and Networking (1)
- Engineering (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Policy History, Theory, and Methods (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Science and Technology Policy (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The First Amendment, Common Carriers, And Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, And Privacy, Christopher S. Yoo
The First Amendment, Common Carriers, And Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, And Privacy, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Recent prominent judicial opinions have assumed that common carriers have few to no First Amendment rights and that calling an actor a common carrier or public accommodation could justify limiting its right to exclude and mandating that it provide nondiscriminatory access. A review of the history reveals that the underlying law is richer than these simple statements would suggest. The principles for determining what constitutes a common carrier or a public accommodation and the level of First Amendment protection both turn on whether the actor holds itself out as serving all members of the public or whether it asserts editorial …
Racial Revisionism, Shaun Ossei-Owusu
Racial Revisionism, Shaun Ossei-Owusu
All Faculty Scholarship
Review of Corey Robin, The Enigma of Clarence Thomas (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2019).
Bostock Was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, And Title Vii, Mitchell N. Berman, Guha Krishnamurthi
Bostock Was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, And Title Vii, Mitchell N. Berman, Guha Krishnamurthi
All Faculty Scholarship
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court held that federal antidiscrimination law prohibits employment discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. Unsurprisingly, the result won wide acclaim in the mainstream legal and popular media. Results aside, however, the reaction to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion, which purported to ground the outcome in a textualist approach to statutory interpretation, was more mixed. The great majority of commentators, both liberal and conservative, praised Gorsuch for what they deemed a careful and sophisticated—even “magnificent” and “exemplary”—application of textualist principles, while …