Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Blame (1)
- Competence (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Copyright (1)
-
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Delling v. Idaho (1)
- Exhaustion (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Field of use restrictions (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- First download (1)
- First sale (1)
- Kirtseang (1)
- Mental disorder (1)
- Patents (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Resale price maintenance (1)
- Responsibility (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Vertical restraints (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Post-Sale And Related Distribution Restraints Involving Ip Rights, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Post-Sale And Related Distribution Restraints Involving Ip Rights, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This book of CASES AND MATERIALS ON INNOVATION AND COMPETITION POLICY is intended for educational use. The book is free for all to use subject to an open source license agreement. It differs from IP/antitrust casebooks in that it considers numerous sources of competition policy in addition to antitrust, including those that emanate from the intellectual property laws themselves, and also related issues such as the relationship between market structure and innovation, the competitive consequences of regulatory rules governing technology competition such as net neutrality and interconnection, misuse, the first sale doctrine, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Chapters …
Abolition Of The Insanity Defense Violates Due Process, Stephen J. Morse, Richard J. Bonnie
Abolition Of The Insanity Defense Violates Due Process, Stephen J. Morse, Richard J. Bonnie
All Faculty Scholarship
This article, which is based on and expands on an amicus brief the authors submitted to the United States Supreme Court, first provides the moral argument in favor of the insanity defense. It considers and rejects the most important moral counterargument and suggests that jurisdictions have considerable leeway in deciding what test best meets their legal and moral policies. The article then discusses why the two primary alternatives to the insanity defense, the negation of mens rea and considering mental disorder at sentencing, are insufficient to achieve the goal of responding justly to severely mentally disordered offenders. The last section …