Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
What Are We Studying? Student Jurors, Community Jurors, And Construct Validity, Stacie R. Keller, Richard L. Weiner
What Are We Studying? Student Jurors, Community Jurors, And Construct Validity, Stacie R. Keller, Richard L. Weiner
Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications
Jury researchers have long been concerned about the generalizability of results from experiments that utilize undergraduate students as mock jurors. The current experiment examined the differences between 120 students (55 males and 65 females, mean age = 20 years) and 99 community members (49 males and 50 females, mean age = 42 years) in culpability evaluations for homicide and sexual assault cases. Explicit attitude measures served as indicators of bias for sexual assault, defendant, and homicide adjudication. Results revealed that student and community participants showed different biases on these general explicit attitude measures and these differences manifested in judgments of …
Holding Parents Responsible: Is Vicarious Responsibility The Public’S Answer To Juvenile Crime?, Eve M. Brank, Edie Greene, Katherine Hochevar
Holding Parents Responsible: Is Vicarious Responsibility The Public’S Answer To Juvenile Crime?, Eve M. Brank, Edie Greene, Katherine Hochevar
Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications
Parental responsibility laws hold parents accountable for the delinquent behaviors of their children even when parents’ actions are not the direct cause of an offense. Despite the prevalence of these laws, we know little about their perceived fairness. Is it reasonable to make parents vicariously responsible for outcomes they could not have foreseen and, if so, under what circumstances? Our series of three studies addressed those questions by systematically examining the impact of various situational and dispositional factors on public opinions regarding parental responsibility. Respondents attributed most of the responsibility for a crime to the child, and attributions of responsibility …
Preface To “When Does Sample Matter In Juror Decision‐Making Research? Differences Between College Student And Representative Samples Of Jurors”, Joel D. Lieberman, Daniel A. Krauss, Richard L. Weiner
Preface To “When Does Sample Matter In Juror Decision‐Making Research? Differences Between College Student And Representative Samples Of Jurors”, Joel D. Lieberman, Daniel A. Krauss, Richard L. Weiner
Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications
It has been 45 years since Kalven and Zeisel (1966) published their groundbreaking book The American Jury. Since that time, the field of jury decision‐making has grown dramatically. A multitude of social and cognitive influences on juror behavior have been identified, as has the influence of many procedural factors such as jury size, jury decision rule, and jury instructions. Several broad theories have been developed that integrate findings, such as commonsense justice (Finkel, 1995, 2001) and the story model (Pennington & Hastie, 1992). Interestingly, although The American Jury may have marked the beginning of the era of jury decision‐making …