Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Resurrecting Missouri V. Holland, Peter J. Spiro
Resurrecting Missouri V. Holland, Peter J. Spiro
Missouri Law Review
This brief essay sketches the constitutional dormancy of Missouri v. Holland and the potential for its activation. The essay first describes how the treatymakers declined the Treaty Power offered them by the Court. In the near century since the ruling, no treaty appears to have depended on the decision for authority. The treatymakers have worked from contrary constitutional premises, establishing a sort of parallel constitutional universe in which the ruling was never handed down. Through these years, Missouri v. Holland has failed accurately to represent prevailing constitutional norms on the question. In other words, arguably, the decision is no longer …
Katrina And The Rhetoric Of Federalism, Christina E. Wells
Katrina And The Rhetoric Of Federalism, Christina E. Wells
Faculty Publications
The public's desire to assign blame for government's inadequate response to Hurricane Katrina has largely focused on the federal government's slow and seemingly inept response to the storm. In their own defense, federal officials cast federalism--the system that divides power among federal, state, and local governments--as the main culprit underlying their inadequate response to hurricane victims. Had power and authority not been split among three different units of government, the argument goes, the federal government might have been able to act more quickly to save lives and prevent suffering. In effect, federal authorities claim to have been hamstrung by a …
No Out For The Federal Government: Enforcing Contractual Arbitration Clauses In Federal Government False Claims Actions - U. S. V. Bankers Ins. Co., Sarah A. Wight
Journal of Dispute Resolution
As a party to one-fourth of all civil litigation2 the federal government exerts a looming presence in American judicial proceedings. Thus, attempts by the government to elude obligations under arbitration agreements, if successful, would significantly impact the elite status that pre-dispute contractual arbitration clauses currently hold.' This casenote examines how the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently addressed this issue in the context of a false claims action.
Understanding Congressional Reform: Lessons From The Seventies, Rafael Gely, Asghar Zardkoohi
Understanding Congressional Reform: Lessons From The Seventies, Rafael Gely, Asghar Zardkoohi
Faculty Publications
The purpose of this article is to examine voting behavior of representatives when faced with dual constraints (constituents back home and the leadership) as compared to one constraint (constituents back home). An ambitious goal of the study would have been to examine the effects of both sets of reforms. However, there are two reasons for not using the 1995 reforms in our empirical examinations. First, not enough time has passed to fully observe the effect of term limits on voting behavior. Second, and more importantly, the leadership, whose power it was to impose a constraint on a representative's promotional opportunities, …
Alternative Means Of Dispute Resolution: Practices And Possibilities In The Federal Government, William French Smith
Alternative Means Of Dispute Resolution: Practices And Possibilities In The Federal Government, William French Smith
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In the early nineteenth century Alexis de Tocqueville predicted that the law would become a secular religion in the United States, and that every important political question would be turned into a matter for law and litigation.' History once again has proven de Tocqueville's remarkable prescience. Over the past two decades, there has been a staggering increase in litigation.2 Americans now are filing more lawsuits than ever before, and are litigating a wide variety of disputes that previously had been resolved through other means.