Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Missouri School of Law

Employee rights

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

State Legislative Update, Mark G. Boyko Jul 2003

State Legislative Update, Mark G. Boyko

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This bill would have prevented employers from requiring employees to arbitrate disputes arising under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). In doing so, it would have changed the established law in California that written agreements to arbitrate disputes are valid and enforceable. Specifically, this bill would have invalidated arbitration agreements between employers and employees if the employer required the employee to sign the agreement as a condition of employment. A.B. 1715 would have applied to employers with five or more employees.


Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration Agreements And Title Vii: Promoting Efficiency While Protecting Employee Rights - Eeoc V. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & (And) Scripps, Steven S. Poindexter Jan 2003

Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration Agreements And Title Vii: Promoting Efficiency While Protecting Employee Rights - Eeoc V. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & (And) Scripps, Steven S. Poindexter

Journal of Dispute Resolution

While the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that claims based on statutory rights may be vindicated by arbitration, the Court has yet to determine the validity of a pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreement ("MAA") that covers Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, contrary to every other district court of appeals to have considered the matter, has held that Title VII claims may not be subjected to arbitration under an MAA. The instant case once again addresses the question of whether the Ninth Circuit will …


Erisa's Quantity Vs. Quality Doctrine: The Eighth Circuit Limits Recovery Against An Hmo By Completely Preempting State Law, Jeremy P. Brummond Apr 2000

Erisa's Quantity Vs. Quality Doctrine: The Eighth Circuit Limits Recovery Against An Hmo By Completely Preempting State Law, Jeremy P. Brummond

Missouri Law Review

Health Maintenance Organizations ("HMOs") were developed to facilitate the provision of effective care at low prices to plan members. To attain this purpose, HMOs have been required to act as both providers who administer care and gatekeepers who can deny access to care.3 The Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), praised as "the greatest development in the life of the American Worker since Social Security,"4 regulates plans administered by IMOs. Congress has stated explicitly that ERISA was enacted to promote the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in employee benefit plans.5 In drafting ERISA, Congress sought to protect plan beneficiaries …


Union-Negotiated Waivers Of An Employee's Federal Forum Rights To Statutory Claims: Are They An Effective Means To Exclusivity, Robert M. Smith Jan 2000

Union-Negotiated Waivers Of An Employee's Federal Forum Rights To Statutory Claims: Are They An Effective Means To Exclusivity, Robert M. Smith

Missouri Law Review

Virtually every collective bargaining agreement provides for the use of labor arbitration in the event that the employer, and the union representing the employee, are unable to reach a mutually agreeable result.' However, even after Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.,3 it remains unclear whether an agreement to arbitrate can require arbitration to be an individual employee's exclusive forum for federal statutory claims. This Note analyzes the United States Supreme Court holding in Wright, and also analyzes both the case law leading up to the Court's decision, and the existing split among the federal circuits as to whether union-negotiated waivers …


Respecting Your Elders: The Highly Marketable Skills Standard For Social Security Disability Claimants Over Age Sixty, Thomas G. Pirmantgen Jan 2000

Respecting Your Elders: The Highly Marketable Skills Standard For Social Security Disability Claimants Over Age Sixty, Thomas G. Pirmantgen

Missouri Law Review

As individuals age, they may face barriers to obtaining employment that did not exist for them when they were younger. Age thus may become a factor in any assessment of the likelihood that persons will successfully find new work. For Social Security disability benefits claimants under age fifty, age is generally not considered to present an obstacle to adjusting to new employment contexts. However, for claimants over age fifty, age is acknowledged as a factor that may significantly impact their ability to adjust to new work