Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Expiating The Sins Of Yoder And Smith: Toward A Unified Theory Of First Amendment Exemptions From Neutral Laws Of General Applicability, Brian A. Freeman
Expiating The Sins Of Yoder And Smith: Toward A Unified Theory Of First Amendment Exemptions From Neutral Laws Of General Applicability, Brian A. Freeman
Missouri Law Review
This Article explores the extent to which the Constitution requires exemptions from neutral laws of general applicability in order to protect the free exercise of religion. Part I sets forth the current Supreme Court jurisprudence in this area, focusing on the most recent cases, which suggest that only laws that are not neutral or generally applicable are subject to strict scrutiny; otherwise, the majority believes that neutral generally applicable laws are subject to rational basis review. Part I also includes a discussion of analogous First Amendment freedom of expression cases, especially the “expressive conduct” cases, in which the court uses …
Personal Jurisdiction Based On Advertising: The First Amendment And Federal Liberty Issues, Keith H. Beyler
Personal Jurisdiction Based On Advertising: The First Amendment And Federal Liberty Issues, Keith H. Beyler
Missouri Law Review
Part I of this Article illustrates the potential impact of treating advertising as a basis for personal jurisdiction by looking at how such treatment might deter interstate advertising by abortion providers. Parts II and III examine whether advertising is a basis for personal jurisdiction under the current requirements and ground rules for personal jurisdiction laid down by the Supreme Court. Parts IV and V examine First Amendment and federalism arguments for treating advertising as an insufficient basis for personal jurisdiction.
First Amendment And Private Property: A Sign For Free Speech, The, Anthony J. Durone, Melissa K. Smith
First Amendment And Private Property: A Sign For Free Speech, The, Anthony J. Durone, Melissa K. Smith
Missouri Law Review
Freedom of speech is one of the best known of all the constitutional rights protected by the Bill of Rights. Freedom of speech has received special attention from the courts for at least three reasons: (1) it is essential to the political process that is the foundation of our democracy;3 (2) it is fundamentally important to the discovery of truth in the free marketplace of ideas;4 and (3) it is an end in itself in a free country. In furtherance of a substantial interest, however, the freedom of speech falls subject to the police power of the state. In City …
You Have The Right To Criticize This Casenote: Protecting Negative Reviews Within The Law Of Defamation And The First Amendment, David C. Vogel
You Have The Right To Criticize This Casenote: Protecting Negative Reviews Within The Law Of Defamation And The First Amendment, David C. Vogel
Missouri Law Review
In Moldea v. New York Times Co., the District of Columbia Court of Appeals attempted to determine under what circumstances a statement labeled as opinion may be the basis for a defamation suit. The court approached the topic with some difficulty, as the United States Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. had created confusion in lower courts over not only the validity of several traditional tests used to distinguish between fact and opinion, but also as to whether placing statements in an opinion context provides them with blanket protection from liability, regardless of their content. The …
Civil Rico, Protesters, And The First Amendment: A Constitutional Combination, Timothy S. Millman
Civil Rico, Protesters, And The First Amendment: A Constitutional Combination, Timothy S. Millman
Missouri Law Review
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") provides for both government causes of action and a private cause of action. The private cause of action is usually referred to as civil RICO In recent years, abortion clinics and other groups have used civil RICO in suits against violent protesters. The circuits had disagreed, however, on whether RICO requires the defendant to be economically motivated. The circuits had disagreed, however, on whether RICO. Therefore, abortion clinics and other potential plaintiffs were uncertain whether civil RICO was a viable option in suits against politically or religiously motivated protesters. Although the Court …