Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Missouri School of Law

Missouri Law Review

2017

Constitution

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

It’S Probable: Missouri Constitution Article I, Section 15 Requires A Higher Standard To Obtain A Warrant For Real-Time Or Prospective Csli, Aaron Hadlow Apr 2017

It’S Probable: Missouri Constitution Article I, Section 15 Requires A Higher Standard To Obtain A Warrant For Real-Time Or Prospective Csli, Aaron Hadlow

Missouri Law Review

The scope of this Note primarily deals with issues surrounding real-time CSLI, although the issues implicated by article I, section 15 of the Missouri Constitution could apply to historic CSLI as well. Part II of this Note discusses general principles of Fourth Amendment law and the Supreme Court’s treatment of searches and seizures in relation to electronic communications and data. It then discusses the statutory developments empowering law enforcement to use emerging technologies for surveillance purposes. Part III discusses recent developments in search and seizure law. It then discusses Missouri’s recent amendment to its constitution, which provides additional protections for …


Missed The Mark: The Supreme Court Of Missouri’S Faulty Application Of Strict Scrutiny To The Right To Bear Arms, Abigail E. Williams Apr 2017

Missed The Mark: The Supreme Court Of Missouri’S Faulty Application Of Strict Scrutiny To The Right To Bear Arms, Abigail E. Williams

Missouri Law Review

The discussion of the scope and potential limitations of the Second Amendment has been at the forefront of the United States’ political debate in recent years. Prior to 2008, Second Amendment jurisprudence was unclear as to what could constitute a lawful restriction of an individual’s right to bear arms. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Heller, affirmed the Second Amendment guarantee of the right to bear arms, holding that a Washington, D.C., law that prohibited possessing handguns in the home was unconstitutional. The Court further indicated that nothing in the opinion “should be taken to …