Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Process-Applicability Of Nonresident Motorist Statutes To Accidents On Private Property, Chester Lloyd Jones S.Ed.
Process-Applicability Of Nonresident Motorist Statutes To Accidents On Private Property, Chester Lloyd Jones S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, a nonresident combine operator, in the course of performance of a contract to harvest plaintiff's wheat crop, drove his vehicle into the plaintiff's wheat field thereby causing a fire which destroyed part of the crop. Plaintiff began an action against defendant by service in accordance with a nonresident motorist statute. The applicable statute read in part:" . . . the acceptance by a nonresident . . . of the rights and privileges . . . to operate motor vehicles on the public highways of the state . . . shall be deemed equivalent to an appointment . . . …
Assault And Battery - Defense Of Property
Assault And Battery - Defense Of Property
Michigan Law Review
In a suit brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's husband the evidence indicated that the deceased, and other intruders, entered defendant's place of business after having been ordered to leave. The group "threw bricks and other missiles at Gennaro, destroying whiskey bottles and other property, whereupon Gennaro secured a pistol and shot and killed Wade." It was held that defendant was justified in killing the inebriated trespasser. Wade v. Gennaro, (La. App. 1942) 8 So. (2d) 561.
Wills - Interpretation Of "Existence" As Used In Statutes Providing For Probate Of Lost Or Destroyed Wills, Edward P. Dwyer, Jr.
Wills - Interpretation Of "Existence" As Used In Statutes Providing For Probate Of Lost Or Destroyed Wills, Edward P. Dwyer, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Testator, about to undergo a serious operation, executed a will leaving $5,000 to his fiancée and the balance of his estate to his brother Louis. Three days later, after the operation had been performed and when testator was apparently on the road to recovery, he informed a lawyer that he desired to give his fiancée a check for $5,000 at once in lieu of the bequest to her in the will, and desired the rest of his estate to go to Louis. Testator mistakenly told the lawyer he had no other relatives. The lawyer then advised him to have the …
Criminal Law And Procedure - Conspiracy To Commit A Misdemeanor As A Felony, Michigan Law Review
Criminal Law And Procedure - Conspiracy To Commit A Misdemeanor As A Felony, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The defendant was indicted for conspiring to destroy the poles and wires of an electric public utility, the destruction of such property being a statutory misdemeanor. The indictment was prosecuted under the provision of the Michigan statutes which states that all crimes indictable at common law are punishable as felonies unless specifically declared otherwise by the statute. The crime of conspiracy comes under this "common-law offense" provision. Upon denial of his motion to dismiss, defendant sought mandamus to review the ruling. Held, an agreement to do an act made a misdemeanor by statute is a common-law conspiracy, and such …
Wills - Joint And Mutual Wills - Contracts To Bequeath And Devise - Statute Of Frauds, Charles J. O'Laughlin
Wills - Joint And Mutual Wills - Contracts To Bequeath And Devise - Statute Of Frauds, Charles J. O'Laughlin
Michigan Law Review
The husband and wife made joint and mutual wills, each giving to the survivor a life interest in his or her separate property with the remainder to their foster daughter, the plaintiff. The wife died first, but the husband destroyed the entire will, and took possession of all the wife's property. The husband then died intestate, and plaintiff brought suit against the heirs to enforce the dispositions made by the joint and mutual will. Plaintiff introduced evidence to show that the will was the product of a contract, and therefore irrevocable. Defendant objected on the grounds that the agreement was …
Insurance - Conditional Vendor's Insurance - Effect Of Repair By Or Restoration To The Vendee Or Sub-Vendee, Michigan Law Review
Insurance - Conditional Vendor's Insurance - Effect Of Repair By Or Restoration To The Vendee Or Sub-Vendee, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a Minnesota corporation, purchased the vendor's interest in an automobile sold under a conditional sales contract. The defendant insured the plaintiff against direct loss or damage to the automobile by collision and/or upset. The vendee, without plaintiff's knowledge or consent, sold the car to a sub-vendee who drove it to Texas, became involved in an accident, and sold the wreckage to a resident of Texas who purchased in good faith. The car was rebuilt and resold. Plaintiff sued for the loss caused by the collision. Held, plaintiff may recover even though the car was repaired by others prior …
Sales - Recovery By Seller Against Third Party Tortfeasor, Robert A. Solomon
Sales - Recovery By Seller Against Third Party Tortfeasor, Robert A. Solomon
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sold a truck under a conditional sales contract expressly reserving title until the purchase price was paid by the buyer. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, possession was transferred to the latter. While the truck was in his possession it was destroyed through the negligence of the defendant, a third party. At the time of the destruction the buyer had not defaulted in the payments. Held, affirming the decision of the lower court, that the plaintiff had no right to maintain an action against the defendant to recover for the negligent destruction of the truck. Gas City …
Torts - Evidence - Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine - Application In Pennsylvania, Robert A. Solomon
Torts - Evidence - Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine - Application In Pennsylvania, Robert A. Solomon
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff sued defendant power company for damages resulting from the destruction of his building by fire. The electricity furnished by defendant, after being reduced by a transformer, passed from its main line through an auxiliary line to a point a few inches from plaintiff's building where it was connected with the wiring system of the building which had been installed, and at the time of the accident was controlled, by plaintiff. Failing to show by direct proof that the transformer was defective and the proximate cause of the loss, plaintiff's claim for negligent destruction of his building was predicated …
Negligence - Violation Of Statute As Negligence Per Se - Exceptions To The Doctrine, John C. Griffin
Negligence - Violation Of Statute As Negligence Per Se - Exceptions To The Doctrine, John C. Griffin
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's intestate was driving along the main thoroughfare when B drove into the main highway from a side street without stopping, thereby colliding with the automobile of the intestate. Two days prior to this accident an automobile owned by S negligently collided with one of the defendant's buses with the consequence that defendant's bus, without negligence on defendant's part, knocked down an arterial stop sign. This stop sign had been erected at the intersection of the main highway and the side street out of which B drove his car. A Washington statute made anyone who should deface, mutilate, tear down, …
Insurance - Remainderman's Share In Proceeds Of Life Tenant's Policy
Insurance - Remainderman's Share In Proceeds Of Life Tenant's Policy
Michigan Law Review
Buildings insured by the life tenant for their full value were totally destroyed and the insurance money paid over to the life tenant. The remainderman brought suit under a statute requiring the giving of security for the protection of the remaindermen by those having limited interests in personal property. Held, the remainderman has no interest in the proceeds of the policy and cannot compel the life tenant to render security. In re Gorman's Estate, (Pa. 1936) 184 A. 86.
Quasi-Contracts-Recovery Of Insurance Paid Under Mistake Of Fact
Quasi-Contracts-Recovery Of Insurance Paid Under Mistake Of Fact
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff insured articles of Jewelry for the defendant against loss. Defendant was unable to find a necklace covered by the policy in question and after an unsuccessful search the parties entered into an agreement whereby the defendant consented to accept other jewelry, equal in value to the necklace, as compensation for the loss. Later the necklace was found, and the plaintiff seeks rescission of the agreement and specific restitution of the articles delivered pursuant thereto. Held, payment made in settlement of an insurance claim may not be rescinded on the basis of mistake of fact as to the …